nagibson1
Lil-Rokslider
This is an overlooked approach. It seems like most guys are seeking higher BC's for long range shooting. But the opposite approach can be really helpful too. Shooting light for bore bullets does something similar to shooting the match bullets- they have a harder hitting surface and expand really fast. They do great "transferring the energy".I can't tell you that, as for me the outdated 270 Win and 110 TTSX has done it, along with the 130 TTSX from a boring old 30-06.
I will absolutely prefer the 35 Whelen AI when I head to the elk woods, but am not at a disadvantage with either of the above rifles and loads. However, something about a .358 Barnes bullet that expands to .736" recovered diameter with respect to carrying considerable momentum after impact and what it does to elk from any hard angle presentation, and broadside as well.
Maybe that makes me versatile, having done the same job with different tools. But then again, a guy is lying if he doesn't say he has a favorite hammer in the shed.
When i was starting out I had a 30-06 and was real recoil shy. I loaded some 110 bullets I found from Nosler, and they grouped awesome. Such low recoil. I was prob at 13 lbs. I took a lot of deer with these, and almost all of them fell right there.
The 110 in the .270 isn't going to do the distance the 25-06 will in that weight, but to 250ish, it has expansion advantages that are really good, and the 270 gives you a versatile gun in a key range. The .277 is still an amazing caliber and the 270 a perfectly relevant cartridge for 95+% of hunters. We can't all be European/Canadian sissies shooing metric 6.5's.
I have a 25 barrel that I may put on a 06 I have, but the bullet selection for .25 seems fairly ignored.