.223, 6mm, and 6.5 failures on big game

Dave0317

WKR
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
394
Location
North MS
Small cal naysayers, this is your chance!

It seems like discussions happen in bits and pieces in lots of threads. The small caliber proponents have this unfairly massive amount of data all compiled in a few great threads.

So I think it would be helpful if the guys that think that is stupid have one consolidated place to share evidence of failures of the .223, 6, or 6.5 calibers using heavy for caliber match ammo.

You got a video of one of those splashy 147 ELDMs “blowing up” on the rib bone of an axis deer? You seen a .223 77 TMK bounce off an Elk?
This is the place to share!
 

wapitibob

WKR
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
5,827
Location
Bend Oregon
Back in the early 80's I shot a Pronghorn Buck, less than 100 yards, with a borrowed 25-06. He dropped but then started to get back up so I shot him again. The 1st bullet hit a rib, followed the rib down, around the brisket, and half way up the other side, and never entered the chest cavity. That bullet was the size and thickness of a dime, just under the hide. No idea what ammo it was, but most likely some cheap Remington stuff or similar. 2nd shot to the neck worked just fine.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
1,834
Location
Wasilla, Alaska
Reposted from a post of mine on another thread:

Here's an interesting bit of info regarding Barnes Match Burner 140's.

A buddy just killed an 11 year old ram here in Alaska with a 20" 6.5 CM.
He used the MB 140 factory ammo.
Muzzle Velocity appx. 2580 fps.

1st shot at 278 yards. Lungs. Ram started running towards him.
2nd shot at 203 yards. Lungs again. Ram ran closer.

Before 3rd shot was taken, he saw blood pouring out and decided to not shoot again.
Ram continued running downhill a couple hundred yards before expiring.

On the autopsy, he found that the exits wounds were only twice caliber size, ie. next to no expansion.
1st impact would have been at appx. 2250fps and second at 2350 fps.

Apparently the 140 variant of the Match Burner did not work as expected at those impact velocities.

Using my 6 CM and 112 Match Burners this season I’ve gotten fantastic results, including a Bull Moose at 525 yards and a Blacktail at 415. Both instances the MB created wide wound channnels and great expansion.
 

KHntr

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Apr 24, 2014
Messages
157
Location
Northern British Columbia
Back about 1999 I shot a good whitetail that was downhill from me at roughly 250 yards and running broadside with a 264 WM and a 140 Nosler Partition. Smacked him right at the shoulder knuckle joint and that bullet turned and followed the front leg down, spiraling around it under the hide twice. Found it at the top of his hoof.

Shoot enough bullets into enough animals and you will see some weird shit happen. Doesn’t matter from what cartridge or company made them.
 

Tmac

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2020
Messages
892
Might be better off to talk about bullets not to use for hunting. More about the bullets terminal performance than the caliber/cartridge imo.
 

Machingeaneer

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 2, 2023
Messages
193
What are we calling a failure here? I know a guy that calls SSTs "super soft turds" because they haven't exited regardless of the fact that they resulted in dead deer.
 
Top