Brent
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
- Messages
- 248
The guide aged him. I don't think I have an up close of that one, just of mine. I'll look for one. Here's mine...
Based on the rings, this one looks 4+.
The guide aged him. I don't think I have an up close of that one, just of mine. I'll look for one. Here's mine...
Ok. Outfitter put 3 on the hunt report card as well. His goat being longer and bigger bases than mine at the same age did have me wondering. Here’s another pic he sent me. This is the 8 3/4” long goat with 5 2/8 bases, not mine. It’s the first goat in the pics in daylight in my report.I see a five year old goat. Definitely not 3.5
This one is mine and the shorter of the two at 7.5” with 5” bases. Both were called 3.5
Looking at the rings, the bigger goat is at least 4.5. It's obviously older than the smaller goat.Ok. Outfitter put 3 on the hunt report card as well. His goat being longer and bigger bases than mine at the same age did have me wondering. Here’s another pic he sent me. This is the 8 3/4” long goat with 5 2/8 bases, not mine. It’s the first goat in the pics in daylight in my report.
LOL!! I see 3.5 on this one! WTF?Ha! I don't know... starting to look like 2.5 yo from that angle...
Here's a 2.5 yo from the same angle for reference.
Isn't the tip section to the first defined ring 2 years?
Thanks for the info @Antares.
I understand it the way it is explained here. The tip section down to the first distinct annulus is 2 years, perhaps minus a month.
View attachment 612833
I do not believe that low probability equates to irresponsible unless there is a chance to wound and lose an animal.
Thank you!Congrats!