ellsworb
Lil-Rokslider
You may be partially correct but that still wouldn't solve it for me. I could possibly get away with a medium in both but as you can see from the photos below I'd still have issues. The difference in torso length and girth doesn't match up. I just snapped some quick photos to illustrate what I'm trying to describe. I promise I'm not stretching the Chama out, I could make it look much worse if I wanted. It's significantly more baggy in the midsection and, as you can see, way shorter than the wilkin. Why would the mid layer be so much shorter and wider? Am I supposed to wear the Chama over a puffy? Remember, these are both size large. Should I be wearing a medium wilkin to and a small Chama? I wonder what a small Chama would do to me torso lengthwise.. Don't get me wrong, I love the Chama and wear it a lot, I'm just trying to point out my experience with the fit and where I hope they are making improvements this year.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
My Wilkin and Chama look exactly the same. . also both in Large. Wilkin is perfect fit (as far as I am concerned) for the base. . but the Chama is just too billowy and short.
This is some of the consistency I'm talking about being addressed in the 2018 line. A M in the 150 Aero is going to be similar to a M in the 250 Merino X. . and each of those are going to fit correctly under a M Softshell/Puffy/ and all of that will fit appropriately under a M SEAK (as an example). Or at least that's how it's been described to me at a couple of shows that First Lite attended.
Happy to be informed otherwise if that doesn't seem correct to the rest of Rokslide though. . cause it'll likely affect my purchasing!