143 ELD-X blew up on the shoulder?

pathnz

FNG
Joined
Apr 10, 2024
Messages
17
Unusual results, insufficient information to draw any conclusions. Doesn't mean much who cares. Plenty of 143s in the world that have done what you'd expect.
 

Bowfinn

FNG
Joined
Jan 6, 2019
Messages
79
Location
Anchorage, Alaska
He said zero tissue damage to lungs or vitals, the lung from the impact side looked bruised but there were no holes or lacerations.
My opinion is that the bullet traveled parallel to the rib cage, and was not a perpendicular impact into the rib cage as described. I believe this due to the elongated horizontal intercostal muscle contusion, rib contusions(bone bruise) on the 1st-7th ribs(circled on rib pictures), possible fracture of the 5th rib(thin line), and the stated bruising on the lung tissue without lacerations by the OPs friend. These cannot happen without significant trauma.

I wonder if a small hole on the front of the shoulder was missed because the tissue damage behind the shoulder was so obvious.

Also if the bullet actually hit broad side as described. When looking at the location of the heavy damage is not around or through any areas of heavy bone (humerus and the spine of the scapulae). I find it unlikely that a bullet would fail to penetrate the body(thin) part of the scapula and a ribs.

To wrap this all up my opinion is that the deer wasn’t as broad side as thought by the shooter. It’s happened to me several times.
Edit-deleted duplicate picture
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0091.jpeg
    IMG_0091.jpeg
    240.3 KB · Views: 6

mxgsfmdpx

WKR
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
5,623
Location
Outside
My opinion is that the bullet traveled parallel to the rib cage, and was not a perpendicular impact into the rib cage as described. I believe this due to the elongated horizontal intercostal muscle contusion, rib contusions(bone bruise) on the 1st-7th ribs(circled on rib pictures), possible fracture of the 5th rib(thin line), and the stated bruising on the lung tissue without lacerations by the OPs friend. These cannot happen without significant trauma.

I wonder if a small hole on the front of the shoulder was missed because the tissue damage behind the shoulder was so obvious.

Also if the bullet actually hit broad side as described. When looking at the location of the heavy damage is not around or through any areas of heavy bone (humerus and the spine of the scapulae). I find it unlikely that a bullet would fail to penetrate the body(thin) part of the scapula and a ribs.

To wrap this all up my opinion is that the deer wasn’t as broad side as thought by the shooter. It’s happened to me several times.
Edit-deleted duplicate picture
Bowfinn looked harder.
 

Wrench

WKR
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
6,121
Location
WA
I've seen enough critters catch bullets to know that it takes more than 2" of soft tissue to disrupt a bullet like that. If he had a piece of rock stuck to his side, I might buy it or if the bullet had literally exploded....but a perfect mushroom, you lost me.
 

svivian

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
3,142
Location
Colorado
My opinion is that the bullet traveled parallel to the rib cage, and was not a perpendicular impact into the rib cage as described. I believe this due to the elongated horizontal intercostal muscle contusion, rib contusions(bone bruise) on the 1st-7th ribs(circled on rib pictures), possible fracture of the 5th rib(thin line), and the stated bruising on the lung tissue without lacerations by the OPs friend. These cannot happen without significant trauma.

I wonder if a small hole on the front of the shoulder was missed because the tissue damage behind the shoulder was so obvious.

Also if the bullet actually hit broad side as described. When looking at the location of the heavy damage is not around or through any areas of heavy bone (humerus and the spine of the scapulae). I find it unlikely that a bullet would fail to penetrate the body(thin) part of the scapula and a ribs.

To wrap this all up my opinion is that the deer wasn’t as broad side as thought by the shooter. It’s happened to me several times.
Edit-deleted duplicate picture
This was along the lines of what I was thinking based on the bruising. It’s also, in my opinion, the most reasonable explanation.
 
Top