I dislike when people throw around "science" as a way to spruce up their arguments. What science is missing?
Why does the identity of someone matter? Things are true or false regardless who's saying it. Just address the claims on face value.
What's the obvious?
My bad. Though for the most part he seems to just not like the vibes of smaller calibers. Trying to find concrete things he said that can be addressed has been kind of difficult. Glad he took down the second episode and I look forward to him (hopefully) following through and going on the Exo...
The fact he even thinks it matters whether someone was in the special forces shows he doesn't even know how to think critically. Why would he think that's relevant?
Maybe Form needs to reveal his identity with a picture of himself wearing a bigger/dumber hat and that'd be sufficient authority.
I'm having mine bedded just so if I have a zero shift I know it's the rings. Scope is an ATACR and the scope base is designed so it can't come loose (plus loctite). That just leaves the chassis and scope rings so may as well check one of those off.
Unbedded chassis can also have zero shift if there's an impact to the barrel. More and more PRS dudes are bedding them for that reason since they tend to bang their barrels on props. It varies in severity by brand. I'm not sure how relevant it is to KRG but I'm about to send my KRG Bravo to be...
I am sure that Caylen is good at passing on the how-to of long range shooting. Zero doubts in that department. That is completely separate from whether he is a curious person open to new/contradictory information. It would be cool if he was both.
That's very true. If he had framed his...
I can't say I'm a huge fan of the voice changer but isn't the point of all this that who he is doesn't matter? Even if he's a 16 year old from England and doesn't even own guns, we live in reality. Game animals are not undiscovered creatures whose anatomy we're guessing at. We know what a bullet...
Most of the time it's vague allusions to "non-ideal shots" so they don't have to say they want the option to shoot something in the ass and have the bullet exit the chest.
"Teacher" in the sense of being open to new information because he feels he owes it to his students to figure out if it's actually useful. He's very clear he hasn't done any droptesting and refuses to do it. It's also clear as day that he doesn't have even a basic understanding of it as I broke...
I'd expect the ZP5 would look noticeably better than the ATACR 5-25. The ATACR also has low power tunneling. So it's more like a 7-25 since below 7 power the image shrinks without the FOV increasing. I can certainly say the 7-35 is noticeably better than the 5-25.
As far as why you don't see...
Tunneling in the way people use it for scopes means decreasing the magnification and the image gets smaller but the FOV does not increase. Glad you like the Trijicon though, seems like many do.
I hope he keeps posting and replying about it. Everything I see makes him look more insecure and it's starting to cross into actually being entertaining.
It's not personal for me to just point out where he's failing in his logic. You seem to know/like the guy and that's fine but if anything doesn't that make you the one who it's personal for? You can't just pull the Uno reverse card and put that on me.
You're not addressing anything I laid out...