Well it usually carries more weight when it comes from someone who actually has a well reasoned argument.
If I ever change my mind on these tests, it's certainly not going to be because of anything you posted.
Sure, I'll concede that point. You changed my mind. And while your initial principle stands, that doesn't mean these tests are actually good at identifying poorly designed scopes.
I do believe volume matters but perhaps not in the way I initially thought.
I don't disagree, but you're discounting volume. How many VX3s are in the wild vs SWFA 6Xs?
I don't know production numbers, nor do I really care to, I'm way deeper into this than I planned to be. 10 times as many...probably more but it doesn't really matter.
But let's just say a 1% failure...
That's the rub. Testing one scope doesn't necessarily tell you much about QC. Anyone can put out a lemon. It happens. It may be rare but it happens, especially if we take into account volume. Some manufacturers produce much, much more than others. That would by default mean more bad units given...
I get what you're trying to say but I don't think it's a very good analogy to these scope tests. The fact is that hundreds if not thousands of people have burned up those light duty trucks doing exactly what you described, that's how we know it's a bad idea to put a 10000lb load on a ranger...
I'm suggesting that a single test of a single scope tells you nothing other than how that particular scope performs. You can't infer that one model or manufacturer is better or worse than another based on one test. It's not statiscally significant in any way whatsoever.
Because they want an easy button. Someone said its good based on a single tested scope so it must be good...right.
A single test of one example really means nothing.
I can appreciate what the tests are trying to accomplish, but for me I just don't see much value in a test of one particular example when that isn't the example I'm going to be using. Run 100 through the same battery with the same results and you have something.
Of course I get that's not...
Hell I'd go a bit further and say there is no need for an expensive combo no matter your experience level. It's simply a want.
I've been hunting for close to 30 years now and could buy any rifle, custom or otherwise, that i wanted. My hunting rifles are ruger americans. They fit me well and...