I likely should have given my reasons why.
1. You will get a cleaner more consistent release, which will lead to more accuracy.
2. You will be able to hold at full draw longer and not have to worry about pain in your fingers.
3. You will build up calusues the likes of a chain gang has never...
It will make a small difference. Not sure if your fingers will notice it. Better ensure that you nocks will still fit. May have to use a thinner serving.
Sounds like a bad nock or fletching contact, but if you changed out the knock then, I have no idea.
Did this arrow act this way from build time, or did it start all of a sudden? If its from build time maybe it's an incorrect spine arrow that got mislabeled. Fastest way to check that is to...
At the end of the day you won't be able to shoot the difference with a stick bow. Find the broadhead you want and then add the additional weight needed with the insert.
Interesting. The HD-Bs do have temperature and pressure readings where the Rs do not. I wonder if that's what's going on. At bowhunting distances there is no difference in the readings.
Hopefully that got your attention...
I have a ballistic calculation question. Really a rangefinder EHR question. I have used a pair of Leica Geovid HD-B 3000 8x42 for many years. I recently wanted a pair of 10s and picked up some Geovid R 10x42 because I don't need all the fancier ballistics...
I'll play...
Leica Duovids 10/15×50
Always on a Sirui carbon tripod with a ball head.
Leica Geovid 8x42 HD-B in a kuiu pro harness.
Rarely carry or use a scope anymore, but when I do it's a Leica Televid 77 that's older than most folks on this forum!
Appreciate the response. Not looking for the ballistic solver options so was hoping to find the new Rs. Do you notice much optical difference between the Pros and the Rs?