My hunting partner and I each have 6 points that we've decided to use this fall. I've spent hours and hours combing through all the info on the WGF websites, including demand reports, harvest data, hunt planner, post-commission meeting hunting season info, etc. I've taken into account amount of public land and accessibility in each unit. Point is to say, I've done my homework. I've narrowed our possibilities down to about 6 units, some with greater chance of drawing than others. But I have some questions relating to I guess I'd say, the strategy of applying. I'm going to throw them out here and if anyone could chime in with some input/tips, I'd appreciate it.
First, if I do indeed list first, second, and third choice of units and draw a tag in any of those choices, we lose our points, right? That is to say, if we don't draw our first choice but draw our second or third, our 6 points are used up, correct?
Second, should we put our most desired unit as first choice, even if it has a slimmer chance of being drawn than our second or third choice? I guess another way of putting it is, if 6 points can't get us our first unit choice or our second choice, will our 6 points then give us as much of a chance for our 3rd choice unit as someone who may have put that unit for their first choice, also with 6 points? Not sure if I explained that clearly.
Third, this is kind of a conceptual question I guess, but it relates to nunber of lopes in a unit and the corresponding hunt quality. Is it better to have a tag in a unit with a lot of antelope and a lot of tags issued (i.e., lots of hunters) or to be in an area with fewer antelope and fewer tags and therefore, fewer hunters? My assmumption would be that WGF knows the population density and as closely as possible, issues the appropriate number of tags so maybe the hunt quality in both scenarios would be roughly equivalent? I'd like to lean to a lower hunter density for enjoyment sake but also, have a good chance for a representative buck.
Thanks in advance and sorry for being so long-winded!
First, if I do indeed list first, second, and third choice of units and draw a tag in any of those choices, we lose our points, right? That is to say, if we don't draw our first choice but draw our second or third, our 6 points are used up, correct?
Second, should we put our most desired unit as first choice, even if it has a slimmer chance of being drawn than our second or third choice? I guess another way of putting it is, if 6 points can't get us our first unit choice or our second choice, will our 6 points then give us as much of a chance for our 3rd choice unit as someone who may have put that unit for their first choice, also with 6 points? Not sure if I explained that clearly.
Third, this is kind of a conceptual question I guess, but it relates to nunber of lopes in a unit and the corresponding hunt quality. Is it better to have a tag in a unit with a lot of antelope and a lot of tags issued (i.e., lots of hunters) or to be in an area with fewer antelope and fewer tags and therefore, fewer hunters? My assmumption would be that WGF knows the population density and as closely as possible, issues the appropriate number of tags so maybe the hunt quality in both scenarios would be roughly equivalent? I'd like to lean to a lower hunter density for enjoyment sake but also, have a good chance for a representative buck.
Thanks in advance and sorry for being so long-winded!