Wind shirt vs softshell

[Macintosh]

Curious about people’s read on this. I see a lot of people dissing softshell jackets. At the same time I see a lot of people using “windshirts” like the BD Alpine Start Hoody. Ive seen it enough that Im curious what people see as the difference between a windshirt vs a softshell.

“Softshell” was originally a stretch woven nylon fabric that was somewhat wind and lightly weather resistant. Most of the popular hunting pants now are “softshells”, just think of that fabric in jacket form. It was only later that membranes and fleece linings and such were added to try to make them more weather resistant or warmer in order to appeal to a less technical audience. Jackets like the BD alpine start hoody are precisely what I mean when I use the term “softshell”. I cut my teeth in the late 80’s and early 90’s when softshells first took off, and it was lightweight stretch woven pants and jackets like the alpine start that found their way into my kit. More recently it seems this type of lighter, more breatheable type of softshell is harder to find in jacket form, but I still havent found anything better for a lot of conditions.

But now I see people calling jackets like this a “wind layer”. Some of those folks Im fairly sure Ive heard say they dont like softshells. I think we must be using the term differently? As far as I can tell, most of these folks DO like softshells, they’re just calling it a wind layer. But even BD refers to their alpine start hoody as a “softshell”.

So is this purely semantics due to the prevalence of heavier, non-breatheable “softshells” having corrupted the term beyond repair?
@mtwarden Im particularly curious to hear your take on this.

 

[Speaks]

i generally think of a softshell as a bit thicker than a wind shirt. Soft shell = OR Ferrozi while a wind shirt = Patagonia Hudini.

The alpine start maybe in between but more of a soft shell.

People call stuff like the Jet stream soft shell but I generally would not if using the term correctly.

 

[wapitibob]

Best of both, Sitka V2 Mountain jacket although a bit thin for an insulating softshell.

 

[MT_Wyatt]

Have used both - my experience and opinion has narrowed how I use them over time. They kind of get applied the same way but a wind shirt/softSHELL (read, not lined) is for higher aerobic or output work while the fleece lined/windproof (read, insulated) is for more start/stop, variable type work.

Thats how I think of it. With the prevalence of higher breathability type hybrid mid layers or active insulation, pairing the light softshell or wind shirt like a BD Alpine start provides a pretty wide range of temp use. This basically weighs what a heavier insulted or windproof softshell can weigh (some are heavier).

I see uses for both. I still like using an insulated soft shell in certain cases (rifle day hunting in later season) where I’m wearing it literally all day and not carrying a storm shell. Anything multi-day/backpack no way. BUT the lighter unlined softSHELL or wind shirt fits a lot better for that specific case.

 

[Macintosh]

i generally think of a softshell as a bit thicker than a wind shirt. Soft shell = OR Ferrozi while a wind shirt = Patagonia Hudini.

The alpine start maybe in between but more of a soft shell.

People call stuff like the Jet stream soft shell but I generally would not if using the term correctly.

I agree. Ferrosi is clearly a softshell. Actually very similar to alpine start. Those are classic softshell fabrics exactly as Ive always understood it.
Houdini I would call a windshirt too—harder fabric, no stretch. It’s missing the “soft” part.
And yeah, jetstream, etc are much more prevalent now. Those all have a membrane and/or a fleece lining, making them a really different category that is heavier, bulkier, less focused on breatheability and layering. Im wondering if most of these people who say they dont like softshells are including the classic stretch woven softshell fabrics, or if they’ve used them…or if theyre referring only to jackets made from the membrane fabrics, and considering stuff like alpine start, ferrosi, a different category.

 

[Poser]

BD Alpine Start:

lots of use in the high country during the summer when it’s a bit cool, almost always a breeze and maybe some mosquitoes, too.
Lots of use in the winter when ski touring on mild blue bird days. Spring skiing at the resorts when it’s hot AF, but you still need to cut the wind a bit on the downhill. Light enough to basically always have with you.

insulated Alpine Start: colder temps, cloudy days, and/or light moisture. Should be a great layer for turkey season, in particular. Still new to this version, but it’s going to be closer to the working definition of a soft shell vs. being just a wind shirt.
You could have this layer and not worry about owning a true soft shell.


True soft shell such as the Kuiu Guide or SG headwall: when weather is particularly cold and particularly nasty: sleet, freezing rain, snow. When you are on the move, putting out some heat and need a breathable layer but it’s cold enough that you won’t overheat in the shell + base layer. On particularly cold hunts, I may not take this layer off at all -sleep in it, wear it all day. Can buy you some amount of time for stop and go: to glass or on a stalk. Much heavier to carry vs. the wind shirts so not something I bring unless I’m sure I’ll wear it. Nice option to have in the jacket quiver, but not a necessity. Great for casual wear, though, maybe even a necessary layer for living in a mountain town.

I hate wearing hard shells unless I have to, so I like having all 3 options.

 

[Macintosh]

True soft shell such as the Kuiu Guide or SG headwall

Ok, this is what Im talking about. To me, these are exactly what a “true softshell” ISNT. To me the “true softshell” is the lighter stretch woven wind layer like the alpine start, with all of the membrane fabrics and fleece-lined fabrics being something different, a far more casual/less outdoor category that doesnt have the versatility or functionality that defines a softshell. Semantics, but this is exactly what Im trying to understand. If the term softshell has evolved to the point that it is truly defined by these heavier and less breatheable jackets, then yeah, I can see why people dont really care for them and call the lighter more breatheable options something different…even if I think this is clearly a miscategorization.

 

[Speaks]

Ok, this is what Im talking about. To me, these are exactly what a “true softshell” ISNT. To me the “true softshell” is the lighter stretch woven wind layer like the alpine start, with all of the membrane fabrics and fleece-lined fabrics being something different, a far more casual/less outdoor category that doesnt have the versatility or functionality that defines a softshell. Semantics, but this is exactly what Im trying to understand. If the term softshell has evolved to the point that it is truly defined by these heavier and less breatheable jackets, then yeah, I can see why people dont really care for them and call the lighter more breatheable options something different…even if I think this is clearly a miscategorization.

I think in the hunting world you will mostly hear this, look at product labeling as well where the companies call them softshell.

Now pop over into the mountaineering world and everyone would be 100% aligned with your definition.

I prefer yours as its more specific, you get a wind shirt that is a specific thing, a softshell that is a specific thing, a hard shell that is a specific thing, and then perhaps the other ones like a Jet stream are just "an insulated jacket" or insulated soft shell.

In most circumstances I prefer a true soft shell for layering with insulation and shell being separate, though I do have a blaze jet stream I use hunting and is fine. But if they sold a decent true softshell in blaze I would prefer it.

Its funny I have some orvis jackets, the "softshell" is heavily insulated and stiff, the other one (i forget the name) is a true softshell but not called that.