I'm curious about the rationale behind archery permit fees for specific seasons in many Western states. While these states mandate proof of completing an archery hunting safety course, it seems that hunting with a firearm poses significantly more risks in my opinion.
Gun hunters typically have a longer effective range, a higher likelihood of accidental discharge, and often hunt in more crowded conditions during their seasons. Additionally, the potential for wounding game is comparable between the two methods.
Given that Hunter's Education courses primarily focus on firearm safety, it's unclear how these principles don't directly apply to archery as well.
Does anyone have any info on what made states adopt this?
Gun hunters typically have a longer effective range, a higher likelihood of accidental discharge, and often hunt in more crowded conditions during their seasons. Additionally, the potential for wounding game is comparable between the two methods.
Given that Hunter's Education courses primarily focus on firearm safety, it's unclear how these principles don't directly apply to archery as well.
Does anyone have any info on what made states adopt this?