UM-built 6mm-284: Initial Range Report

Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Messages
444
Location
NM
I finally got a chance to start load development in my new 6mm-284 UM build, and figured my info/results may be of interest so some of the others that have been experimenting with various small-caliber recipes. This is an old cartridge, but one I feel deserves a second look with the rise of slow burning powders and heavy for caliber bullets that didn't exist when it was essentially written off as a barrel-burner in its previous life.

I agonized over interior ballistics and mag length dimensions for quite a while before arriving on this as a "goldilocks" solution. Initially I had hoped to do something based on a necked down 6.5x55 improved, but have become convinced over time that the reason a universal 6.5x55 improved hasn't really taken off is because a better thing already exists in the 6.5-284 case.

Things I've learned since going down this road:
  1. Building on a Tikka action would have alleviated the mag length restriction of a Rem 700 SA. Oh well. I like my Tikkas. But, back to back I feel the ergonomics are better on the Rem 700 short action, even though the Tikka has many other tangible benefits.
  2. Building a 6 PRC wildcat would have accomplished the same thing. Oh well. I had already collected 500 pieces of Lapua 6.5-284 brass which should last me a very long time, and I believe the shape of the 284 makes for a slightly smoother feeding setup. Not sure if an extra fits in the mag or not compared to a PRC case. Possibly? In the end, the -284 case tickles my fancy for something nostalgic and unique in a way that the PRC case wouldn't (back to the original quest of a x55 or x57 improved parent case)
IMG_7807.jpg

The Rifle:
  • BAT Vesper SA
  • Ace 2b 18" 7TW Barrel, fluted
  • 6mm-284 chambering
  • UM Bottom Metal and Standard Mags
  • Rokstok
  • UM Low Rings
  • Maven RS1.2
  • TBAC brake and Ultra 7

The Great:
  • The action is phenomenal. Compared to my other Defiance actions (I have a short AnTi, a short AnTi-X, a medium Ti-X, and a long AnTi), this thing is in a league of its own. I really like the bolt knob/handle, and the fluting pattern on the bolt seems to leave a lot smoother action than the somewhat sloppy feel induced by the deeper/fewer flutes on the Defiance bolts.
  • The UM Standard Magazine feeds this cartridge very well. I had previously messed with 284 cases from binderless AICS mags and couldn't get them to feed well from either standard or magnum magazines. Not sure if UM tweaked the feed lips or not, but these feed great from the 3.15" mag box in the UM design.
  • Speaking of mags, I like the UM bottom metal mag release a LOT better than the Hawkins DBM setup on some of my others. I thought the protruding magazine in their design might annoy me, but so far it hasn't at all. If I feel differently after time in the field, I'll be sure to update this.
The other:
  • Build took forever. I think it was about 15-16 months from initial order to delivery. Oh well, I had other projects that kept me more than busy in the interim, and didn't nag them about it.
  • The throating is quite long. I sent in dummy rounds with a 115 DTAC at 3.100, and asked for it to be throated about .030" off the lands. My hornady checker has me at 3.360 or so off the lands, which is a pretty long jump. Not sure why they did that, but I wish we would have at least talked about the reasoning behind the change (if there was any). I figured I'd shoot it before I complained about this and see how it did. Seems to do fine even with the long jump. Edit: turns out I’m just a moron and the chamber neck was a little tighter than my OAL checker dummy cartridge. Measured the old fashioned way, I’m into the lands at 3.127”, which is exactly the .030” I asked for over the dummy rounds I sent in.

IMG_3758.jpeg

Load details:
  • Lapua 6.5-284 brass necked down through 25-284 and 6-284 dies
  • Remington Large Rifle Primers
  • 115 Nosering DTACS at 3.100"
  • Lots of Retumbo (I'm not posting quantity, as I'm 100% sure I'm over standardly accepted pressure limits)

IMG_7982.jpg
IMG_7983.jpg

Range results:

I've got 35 rounds down the tube now. Firing was slow to keep the heat down, and I did commit the blasphemy of cleaning after the first session. All shots fired in slow 5 round strings with some breaks to walk and check targets, calculate groups, log data, etc. between. All groups were sub-MOA, with my final group being the best at just over 0.5 MOA (barrel seemed to tighten up during initial break-in). Velocities are higher than expected, with the strings I fired increasing from 2940fps to 3000fps over the 7 groups. I started running into pressure signs around 2960 or so, and looking back at the cases afterwards there are very slight ejector marks and a few instances of tiny primer craters even on the 2940fps loads.

Ballistic-X-Export-2025-10-03 13_13_39.060291.jpg

Conclusion:

Velocity is about 300fps faster than factory Berger/Norma/Hornady loads with lighter 105-109gr bullets from my 18" 6mm Creedmoor. I'm probably overpressure with these loads, but not exceptionally so. If I am, the BAT action is handling it extremely well.

I'm going to back off the load slightly and try a few strings around 2900fps. Gordon's load data was pretty far off on this combo relative to other loads I've worked up in similar cartridges. This is the first time I've used Gordon's with Retumbo, so that's likely the culprit.

Shootability is phenomenal. I can't detect any difference in felt recoil from my 6CM that's also mounted in a Rokstok with a similar weight barrel profile and optics setup, but clearly this is a significantly superior ballistics package compared to the 6CM.

Overall, I'm very happy, and plan to spend a lot more time working with this after I finish up my Utah restricted rifle hunt this fall.
 
Good write up & nice rifle. N570 I beleive will get you a little more speed
 
Good write up & nice rifle. N570 I beleive will get you a little more speed
Thanks! I’ve got a jug of N570 set aside for the 25-300 WSM I’m also fooling with on a Tikka action, but I keep hearing horror stories about the throat erosion that comes along with using it.
 
rounds with a 115 DTAC at 3.100, and asked for it to be throated about .030" off the lands. My hornady checker has me at 3.360 or so off the lands, which is a pretty long jump. Not sure why they did that, but I wish we would have at least talked about the reasoning behind the change (if there was any). I figured I'd shoot it before I complained about this and see how it did. Seems to do fine even with the long jump.

Are you saying you’re not in the lands until 3.360” coal or roughy 0.230” longer than you asked for?
 
Are you saying you’re not in the lands until 3.360” coal or roughy 0.230” longer than you asked for?
Yes, that’s correct.

I’m guessing where that’s some of the extra velocity compared to what Gordon’s predicted is coming from. I don’t load for much else with that kind of jump.
 
Yes, that’s correct.

I’m guessing where that’s some of the extra velocity compared to what Gordon’s predicted is coming from. I don’t load for much else with that kind of jump.

That seems like the entire bearing surface would be out of the neck to get to 3.360” and not by a little. How did you even get that measurement? I measured a dtac at 1.103” from back of bearing surface to tip. 6.5x284 max brass length is 2.170” (not sure was the 6x284 brass length is). So if brass length were the same, the boat tail just kissing the case mouth would be roughly 3.270” or 90 thou short of the dimension you gave.
 
That seems like the entire bearing surface would be out of the neck to get to 3.360” and not by a little. How did you even get that measurement? I measured a dtac at 1.103” from back of bearing surface to tip. 6.5x284 max brass length is 2.170” (not sure was the 6x284 brass length is). So if brass length were the same, the boat tail just kissing the case mouth would be roughly 3.270” or 90 thou short of the dimension you gave.

Yessir, that’s correct. Seating at bearing surface got me to right about a 3.1” COAL. I got the ~3.360” measurement to the lands using the Hornady OAL checker. It’s hard to get an exact measurement, because as you mentioned only the boat-tail is in the case mouth at that point, so it’s super-wobbly trying to get a caliper measurement.

So I’m jumping something over .2” to the lands.

If that doesn’t make sense, I can take a photo of how I’m measuring it. That tool has been spot on for everything else I’ve ever measured with it.
 
Yessir, that’s correct. Seating at bearing surface got me to right about a 3.1” COAL. I got the ~3.360” measurement to the lands using the Hornady OAL checker. It’s hard to get an exact measurement, because as you mentioned only the boat-tail is in the case mouth at that point, so it’s super-wobbly trying to get a caliper measurement.

So I’m jumping something over .2” to the lands.

If that doesn’t make sense, I can take a photo of how I’m measuring it. That tool has been spot on for everything else I’ve ever measured with it.
Glad it’s shooting, but that’s wildly off from the specs you asked for.

Maybe I missed it, but did you bring this to UMs attention when you measured this?
 
Yessir, that’s correct. Seating at bearing surface got me to right about a 3.1” COAL. I got the ~3.360” measurement to the lands using the Hornady OAL checker. It’s hard to get an exact measurement, because as you mentioned only the boat-tail is in the case mouth at that point, so it’s super-wobbly trying to get a caliper measurement.

So I’m jumping something over .2” to the lands.

If that doesn’t make sense, I can take a photo of how I’m measuring it. That tool has been spot on for everything else I’ve ever measured with it.
Makes perfect sense, thanks. Just seemed so far off that I had to ask with specifics. Good thing it seems to be shooting quite well!
 
Turns out I’m kind of a dumbass, at least this time. I was redoing my measurements to take photos of how it works, and realized the modified shell casing wasn’t entering the chamber fully. Turns out I just have a really tight neck in the chamber.

Measuring the old fashioned way with a dummy cartridge and a loose neck so the bullet hits the lands and pushes into the neck while chambering, I came up with 3.127” to the lands.

Which is exactly what I freaking asked for.

Sorry for the confusion, I’m going to line out and notate my original post…
 
Back
Top