Jesse Jaymes
WKR
I already bought a nice Olympus from Doug a few years ago. I don't use it nearly as much as I hoped. I am wanting an extended zoom bridge camera point and shoot.
I know almost nothing about photography, the holy trinity of settings, or other BS. Maybe when I retire I will go All In. But I travel, scout and live rural. Back in the day I had a Canon Powershot something. Took it everywhere. Got a lot of cool shots with it. Image quality was probably junk. But I got the pics and really enjoyed coming home and showing the pics or bears, goats, sheep or whatever.
Point is I HAD A BLAST. And second point was the camera was ALWAYS with me. Truck seat, backpack, whatever.
I am suffering Analysis Paralysis. I for sure have a budget. I am not going Baller on a Sony anything for $1600. Leaving for a trip to Hawaii in a couple week and want to pack along a camera.
I've never bought anything Panasonic. The have an FZ300 which seems weatherproof. Offers 24X optical zoom (did see one review that it was really only equivalent to 200mm in DSLR- I am confused here, as specs claim 600mm equiv). Priced sub $500. In my budget. And may allow a filter to be screwed on the lens. More for protection than anything.
Cons are 2015 technology and 12mp. Do I care? I am not at all a techie...but 2015??? Wow
Canon has the SX70. I'm familiar with Canon. To me it's like a Ford or Chevy. Just kinda THE name. 65X optical. Reported to have great IS and AF. About the max I would want to spend at just sub $800.
Reported to be VERY poor in low light....which is when most of the critters are around.
I will digiscope through a Swaro or Meopta for super LR dedicated hunting, scouting stuff.
Anyone have a Pro or Con to either or experience with either? This would just be a bumming around, toss in my Man Purse, travel, dicking around camera that I would hope take a decent enough photo at 100 yards of elk, deer or moose....that a 7yr old would immediately be able to identify.
Any that I am missing? Those Nikon P series seem like Giants. I think physically too large to really pack around daily.
I know almost nothing about photography, the holy trinity of settings, or other BS. Maybe when I retire I will go All In. But I travel, scout and live rural. Back in the day I had a Canon Powershot something. Took it everywhere. Got a lot of cool shots with it. Image quality was probably junk. But I got the pics and really enjoyed coming home and showing the pics or bears, goats, sheep or whatever.
Point is I HAD A BLAST. And second point was the camera was ALWAYS with me. Truck seat, backpack, whatever.
I am suffering Analysis Paralysis. I for sure have a budget. I am not going Baller on a Sony anything for $1600. Leaving for a trip to Hawaii in a couple week and want to pack along a camera.
I've never bought anything Panasonic. The have an FZ300 which seems weatherproof. Offers 24X optical zoom (did see one review that it was really only equivalent to 200mm in DSLR- I am confused here, as specs claim 600mm equiv). Priced sub $500. In my budget. And may allow a filter to be screwed on the lens. More for protection than anything.
Cons are 2015 technology and 12mp. Do I care? I am not at all a techie...but 2015??? Wow
Canon has the SX70. I'm familiar with Canon. To me it's like a Ford or Chevy. Just kinda THE name. 65X optical. Reported to have great IS and AF. About the max I would want to spend at just sub $800.
Reported to be VERY poor in low light....which is when most of the critters are around.
I will digiscope through a Swaro or Meopta for super LR dedicated hunting, scouting stuff.
Anyone have a Pro or Con to either or experience with either? This would just be a bumming around, toss in my Man Purse, travel, dicking around camera that I would hope take a decent enough photo at 100 yards of elk, deer or moose....that a 7yr old would immediately be able to identify.
Any that I am missing? Those Nikon P series seem like Giants. I think physically too large to really pack around daily.