So I see a lot of folks posting pics of their glock 20 as their sidearm of choice, and it has me wondering about stepping up to the 10 mm, if so does anyone have anything good or bad to say about the glock 20 or 40. I am leaning towards the 40 for versatility down the road, but will it just be to large to carry and will it be in the way? I plan on hooking it to the waist belt of my backpack. I currently have other options such as a super red hawk in 454 casul, 40 S&W, or 9 mm. I would mostly plan on using this as a side arm in Colorado during general archery season or doing general backpacking or possibly for small game hunting in texas (that is if I got the 40 with the optic plate). If I were going where I knew Grizzlies where I think I would be leaning toward the 454. Any thoughts I am open to, just wondering if any others had any experience.
Thanks,
Matt
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks,
Matt
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk