RokStok

[Coopsdaddy]

Ya,not sure but if it only adds a 1/4 and future changes are easily done it seems like a good idea.

 

[TimberHunter]

I like that!
I could do without there branding though.

Do you remove the branding on the vehicle you drive? I doubt it…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[HuntHarder]

The spacers are ugly IMO. I shoot the stock as is, with no difficulty. Allowing the adjustability I think, makes people think they "need it."

 

[silasbowhunter]

The spacers are ugly IMO. I shoot the stock as is, with no difficulty. Allowing the adjustability I think, makes people think they "need it."

I shoot the stock just fine without the spacers but I need higher rings and maybe 1/2” on the LOP. Granted I’m 6’4 with a longer neck.. but it’s enough of a project it’ll be after season ha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[43.6N]

Curious to know if the guys needing spacers are also using dovetail rings that are limiting how far forward they can mount their scope?

I’m 6’ with slightly longer then average extremities and neck. When I set my eye relief using pic rail rings, I had no trouble at all with the length of pull on the Rokstok.

Also the 1” Nightforce rings were absolutely perfect with the comb height on the Rokstok.

 

[Coopsdaddy]

Do you remove the branding on the vehicle you drive? I doubt it…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not even sure why I’m responding but actually yes.
Look at my Tacoma in some of my post.
Heck you can find some of my old 4runner that’s debadged as well if your really bothered by it.
Emblems removed from side and tailgate.
Why would that mater to you?Do you not like things a certain way.Seems most do or all rokstocks would come vanilla.
Last I saw that’s a big part of there bussiness model.Making unique and good look rifles.

 

[TimberHunter]

Not even sure why I’m responding but actually yes.
Look at my Tacoma in some of my post.
Heck you can find some of my old 4runner that’s debadged as well if your really bothered by it.
Emblems removed from side and tailgate.
Why would that mater to you?Do you not like things a certain way.Seems most do or all rokstocks would come vanilla.
Last I saw that’s a big part of there bussiness model.Making unique and good look rifles.

Alright you’re one of the few that just don’t like emblems and remove them off everything

Reason I brought it up is people love to hate and critic little things, just gets old hearing. I know if I had put as much time and money into a product like they did, it would darn sure have my emblem on it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Bluumoon]

The spacers are ugly IMO. I shoot the stock as is, with no difficulty. Allowing the adjustability I think, makes people think they "need it."

It depends on what scope you are using. SWFA, no need. Maven 1.2, every shooter (5'8"-6'5") I've seen get behind it without spacers has to adjust their head to the rear after making cheek weld to get a clear scope view, most don't realize they are doing it until pointed out.

 

[kopmantrey]

The spacers are ugly IMO. I shoot the stock as is, with no difficulty. Allowing the adjustability I think, makes people think they "need it."

I would have to disagree with this 100% at 6' 7" I find the normal LOP to be very uncomfortable even my normal height friends prefer theirs in a slightly longer LOP. I think most would benefit from slightly longer LOP on the rokstok.

 

[benconfused]

It depends on what scope you are using. SWFA, no need. Maven 1.2, every shooter (5'8"-6'5") I've seen get behind it without spacers has to adjust their head to the rear after making cheek weld to get a clear scope view, most don't realize they are doing it until pointed out.

Funny you call this out, I've noticed myself doing that. But I'm not sure it bothers me enough to want to add LOP. I like the comfort level the Rokstok is providing as is so far.

 

[Helislacker]

I’ve been using my Rokstok all sheep season and love it. That said, it’s got some deep-ish nicks and scratches mostly from a few tumbles in the rocks. I’m curious if these could be an issue for the carbon fibre or if it’s nothing to worry about. I don’t care about the cosmetic aspect as my rifle is butt ugly, just concerned about the stock strength and rigidity.

 

[HuntHarder]

I would have to disagree with this 100% at 6' 7" I find the normal LOP to be very uncomfortable even my normal height friends prefer theirs in a slightly longer LOP. I think most would benefit from slightly longer LOP on the rokstok.

Clearly being 6'7", you probably have a length of pull issue with most stocks.

 

[bpitcher]

It depends on what scope you are using. SWFA, no need. Maven 1.2, every shooter (5'8"-6'5") I've seen get behind it without spacers has to adjust their head to the rear after making cheek weld to get a clear scope view, most don't realize they are doing it until pointed out.

This has been my experience with the Maven and Rokstok as well. I have had to find a middle ground between acceptable LOP and eye relief.

 

[kopmantrey]

Clearly being 6'7", you probably have a length of pull issue with most stocks.

I just took your post to mean they shouldn't be offering the LOP spacers i may have miss understood. Have you tried it with a longer LOP? Even the normal height guys seem to enjoy it better that I'm around. I will say I don't think the spacers look great but luckily I have a duplicator and can make wood stocks that fit me without spacers.

 

[Formidilosus]

I’ve been using my Rokstok all sheep season and love it. That said, it’s got some deep-ish nicks and scratches mostly from a few tumbles in the rocks. I’m curious if these could be an issue for the carbon fibre or if it’s nothing to worry about. I don’t care about the cosmetic aspect as my rifle is butt ugly, just concerned about the stock strength and rigidity.

Not an issue.

 

[HuntHarder]

I just took your post to mean they shouldn't be offering the LOP spacers i may have miss understood. Have you tried it with a longer LOP? Even the normal height guys seem to enjoy it better that I'm around. I will say I don't think the spacers look great but luckily I have a duplicator and can make wood stocks that fit me without spacers.

I'm not overly tall @ 5' 10", I personally have not seen a reason to try the spacers yet. I did take some guys' advice and go with taller rings than I usually would have. Overall, the stock feels pretty spot on for me.

 

[benconfused]

I'm not overly tall @ 5' 10", I personally have not seen a reason to try the spacers yet. I did take some guys advice and go with taller rings than I usually would have. Overall, the stock feels pretty spot on for me.

Same - also 5'10 and running med UM rings, very happy.

 

[Speaks]

6’2 and running an rs1.2. 1 spacer and UM lows are where its at for me.

 

[rbutcher1234]

It’s so interesting how different people are. I’m 5’7” and I have whatever number of spacers equals a 14.5 LOP

 

[uglymud]

I'm 6'2", shooting with a RS1.2 and UM medium rings, with all the spacers in. Feels fairly comfortable, but I might pick up a set of low rings to try come spring.

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk