AntlerFever
FNG
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2021
- Messages
- 95
Thoughts on one vs the other
Mk 5-
1) I like the turret locking and audible clicks
2) like the red illuminated reticle better
3) Glass may be negligibly better
4) I like 34mm tube (but unfortunately doesn’t have a 50 mm objective in the 3.6 -18
5) Like the length of the 3.6-18… the 5-25 seems so much bigger though for not that much more mag
NX8
1) like the mag range better in both the 2.5-20 and the 4-32
2) 50 mm objective but lacks the 34 mm tube
3) Priced slightly better IMO
4) Size weight profile better for both models (at least compared to MK5 5-25)
Any other brands/ models to look at , want something that is no doubt going to return to zero and track. I am leaning towards FFP but if I go with FFP it’s got to illuminate since it will be used for hunting and I don’t really want to lose my reticle in brush or on animal in low light
Mk 5-
1) I like the turret locking and audible clicks
2) like the red illuminated reticle better
3) Glass may be negligibly better
4) I like 34mm tube (but unfortunately doesn’t have a 50 mm objective in the 3.6 -18
5) Like the length of the 3.6-18… the 5-25 seems so much bigger though for not that much more mag
NX8
1) like the mag range better in both the 2.5-20 and the 4-32
2) 50 mm objective but lacks the 34 mm tube
3) Priced slightly better IMO
4) Size weight profile better for both models (at least compared to MK5 5-25)
Any other brands/ models to look at , want something that is no doubt going to return to zero and track. I am leaning towards FFP but if I go with FFP it’s got to illuminate since it will be used for hunting and I don’t really want to lose my reticle in brush or on animal in low light