New scope for NRL hunter and general hunting use

Joined
Sep 30, 2024
Messages
27
Hi all, would appreciate any help making a choice for a new scope.
I have a Christensen arms ridgeline in 6.5 creedmoor and recently ordered an xlr element chassis for it. Now I need to make a decision on the scope. $1600 budget, ffp, mils
Forms approved choices as I see relevant:
Maven Rs1.2 2.5- 15
Trijicon Tenmile 3-18
Nx8 ( not sure I can fit this in the budget)

Non drop tested, but recommended by others or seem to have good reviews:
Leupold mark 4hd 4.5-18 or 6-24
Maven rs3.2 5-30

These are the options I’m considering. Not sure I can afford the NF,
I love the rs1.2 but worry it’s not enough magnification for matches. But I do think it’s the best overall hunting scope. Which is why I’m considering the larger rs3.2 but nervous it hasn’t been drop tested.
Tenmile is probably the front runner right now.
Nervous to trust leupold.
Thanks for any thoughts or recommendations on scopes, reticle choice, and magnification requirements.
 
OP
H
Joined
Sep 30, 2024
Messages
27
To clarify, needs to be excellent for general hunting use out to my max range of 400 yards. But also needs to meet the requirements for NRL hunter. In other words I’m not willing to pick a scope/reticle that excels in matches but sucks in the field.
Thanks
 

Justin Crossley

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
7,587
Location
Buckley, WA
All three of those scopes would work just fine.

Grab the Trijicon if you want a little more mag but the Maven would work great as well. The 4-32 NX8 is what I use but it's not worth blowing your budget.

I would not buy the RS3.2 or the Mark 4.

20240602_154925.jpg
 
OP
H
Joined
Sep 30, 2024
Messages
27
All three of those scopes would work just fine.

Grab the Trijicon if you want a little more mag but the Maven would work great as well. The 4-32 NX8 is what I use but it's not worth blowing your budget.

I would not buy the RS3.2 or the Mark 4.

View attachment 804360
Thanks Justin,
That Helps me narrow it down to Tenmile or RS1.2.
Love the RS1.2 on my tikka 223 so I’m tempted to just stick with that and it leaves room in the budget for a bipod.
But the Tenmile is tempting mostly just to try something different.
Thanks again
 

Kurts86

WKR
Joined
Aug 15, 2020
Messages
593
For what it’s worth NX8 demos/blems typically go for $1600-$1650 so that’s a possibility right at the top end of your budget.

That said I have an NX8 and a RS1.2 and the Maven does most things as well except for the integrated throw lever and the NX8 illumination is a bit better. The zoom ratio is a party trick that comes with trade offs.
 

jamesmc8

WKR
Joined
Oct 26, 2021
Messages
407
I ran the Trijicon Tenmile on a 6 creed hunting rifle last year and have recent experience with the Maven. The Trijicon worked great, maintains a good eye box up to 15X vs about 12x on the Maven so you get a bit more functional mag. The reticle on the Trijicon is fine and hard to see below 6x when hunting so know that you may need to rely on its illumination in low light/low mag hunting scenarios. Both great scopes!
 
OP
H
Joined
Sep 30, 2024
Messages
27
What would you guys say is necessary for top end magnification?
Most of my practice is in the 300-500 range and I’m usually not past 8x.
I know matches go much further, but it seems like 15x would be sufficient. So why do so many guys run a 5-25?
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
9,805
What would you guys say is necessary for top end magnification?
Most of my practice is in the 300-500 range and I’m usually not past 8x.
I know matches go much further, but it seems like 15x would be sufficient. So why do so many guys run a 5-25?

I've only shot NRL hunter at 1 venue and most targets are 300-550 yards and 1 stage was a bit over 700. RS1.2 was perfectly serviceable in that application for me. Generally, the bigger 5-25x56 type scopes are just nice to get behind at the typical magnifications used in matches.

I can see why a finer reticle with 0.2 mil hashes would be nice if targets were further and smaller. NRL targets are generally larger and closer than say a PRS match targets.
 

Justin Crossley

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
7,587
Location
Buckley, WA
I've only shot NRL hunter at 1 venue and most targets are 300-550 yards and 1 stage was a bit over 700. RS1.2 was perfectly serviceable in that application for me. Generally, the bigger 5-25x56 type scopes are just nice to get behind at the typical magnifications used in matches.

I can see why a finer reticle with 0.2 mil hashes would be nice if targets were further and smaller. NRL targets are generally larger and closer than say a PRS match targets.
I've never shot an NRL match that didn't have targets to at least 950 yards.
 

Juan_ID

WKR
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
1,681
Location
Idaho
Thanks Justin,
That Helps me narrow it down to Tenmile or RS1.2.
Love the RS1.2 on my tikka 223 so I’m tempted to just stick with that and it leaves room in the budget for a bipod.
But the Tenmile is tempting mostly just to try something different.
Thanks again
While I do believe 15x is more than enough mag for nrl and I believe the 1.2 is a great scope do not like it for that use. The reticle is pretty thick compared to some others I’ve used and I just didn't care for it while shooting the farther and/or smaller targets. I think it was a combo of the thickness plus the big open space around the center dot that made it weird for me. Hope your experience is different than mine.
For what it’s worth I used a 6-24 mark 4 for the last couple matches of the season and used that same scope all hunting season with 0 issues.
 
Top