NE Nevada tag reductions and winter kill. (Ruby Mountains)

nphunter

WKR
Joined
Jul 27, 2016
Messages
1,952
Location
Oregon
I’ve seen a ton of talk about WY, UT and East ID deer taking a huge hit but it sounds like NE NV took one as well.

I just spoke with the bio out of Elko discussing the Rubies. They are seeing 50% fawn mortality and about 20% adult mortality. Sounds like there are going to be some huge tag cuts due to the hit the deer herd took this winter.

I assume a good portion of that 20% adult mortality are older age class bucks. I wonder if they will be announcing the reduced numbers prior to the application deadline in a coupe weeks? It sounds like there will be a significant reductions.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2018
Messages
982
Location
Wyoming
Bucks run really close to the same morts as does in the winter. For instance the collared bucks are at 49% in the Wyoming Range and the does are at 47% survival currently.

20% mortality is only slightly set back. Averages around the west are 10-15% on any given unit, so I wouldn’t be too alarmed if I were hunting the Ruby’s. Probably nice to ease a little pressure if a guy can still draw.
 
OP
nphunter

nphunter

WKR
Joined
Jul 27, 2016
Messages
1,952
Location
Oregon
NR Rifle deer tags in 101-109 reduced from 150 down to 36 tags. NR Archery from 73 total to 47.

Res from about 3300 total combined tags down to about 1400.

Overall about a 60% reduction in total tags. Around 70% decrease in rifle tags across the board.

That should make an impact for sure!
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2018
Messages
982
Location
Wyoming
I went back and did more digging. Bummer so many units have cuts outside the NE corner, too. I always find it funny when NV makes 1-3 tag changes year to year. Maybe it’s statistically significant but when you’re talking Archery tags it feels excessive.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
2,736
Location
hawai'i
curious as why would they decrease early season tags but increase mid season tags in certain units. looking at 171-173. any clue what that would accomplish? genuinely curious.

short term this feels like a kick in the you know what but long term this moisture should help the herd down the road? or is this nothing to be half glass full about
 
OP
nphunter

nphunter

WKR
Joined
Jul 27, 2016
Messages
1,952
Location
Oregon
curious as why would they decrease early season tags but increase mid season tags in certain units. looking at 171-173. any clue what that would accomplish? genuinely curious.

short term this feels like a kick in the you know what but long term this moisture should help the herd down the road? or is this nothing to be half glass full about

Maybe they were trying to re-allocate some of those 1500+ rifle tags they cut? Mid season is also the hardest time period to kill a buck, they tend to stick to cover once they strip their velvet, so it should be the rifle season with the lowest success rate.

I agree with the moisture being good, from talking with bio's it sounds like this drought has been keeping does skinny, and skinny does often don't breed and are not always successful when they do. It should defiantly be a good year for antler growth for the bucks that survived.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2020
Messages
336
curious as why would they decrease early season tags but increase mid season tags in certain units. looking at 171-173. any clue what that would accomplish? genuinely curious.

short term this feels like a kick in the you know what but long term this moisture should help the herd down the road? or is this nothing to be half glass full about
I believe its a " more tags, less death" strategy by NDOW. Give some folks the opportunity to hunt but not crush what's left on the landscape post-drought
 
Top