So yesterday I decided to upgrade my binos. I've been using Vortex Diamondback 10x42s, not the hds but the model before. I went into scheels yesterday to check out a bunch of different options. I ended up landing on the Zeiss Conquest V4 10x42s. They were all pretty close in quality in the store, I expected that as the lighting was good. I got home all excited to try them out as the sun was going down in comparison to my Vortex set. To my surprise, the zeiss were almost not any better at all than my old 200 dollar diamondbacks. Even in low light they were pretty much an even match. The two areas you could say they were an improvement was eye relief, and MAYBE clarity, but not by much. Eye relief wise they were slightly better when wearing my glasses. As far as clarity, the center of the images were pretty evenly matching with a very slight edge going to the zeiss, however the very edges of the image, the zeiss was definitely sharper. I guess I was expecting more from my first set of quality glass. I know this isnt the top Zeiss model offered by any stretch, but coming from the bottom line Vortex, I was expecting better, especially in low light. Has anyone else had a similar experience or is it possible I got bad glass? Or maybe I was expecting to much?