Is this amount of Flex Normal? Tikka CTR w/ Bipod

that does seem like a lot. on the left side of the rifle is the pressure relief hole just kiss the top of the stock inlet? the action may not be seated into the recoil lug properly.

I just hogged out my factory stock for more gap around my barrel and noticed I have a bit more flex init as well
 
The decrease in stock-to-barrel clearance appears to be due to you twisting the stock. It's further exacerbated from the non-pivoting bipod.
 
The decrease in stock-to-barrel clearance appears to be due to you twisting the stock. It's further exacerbated from the non-pivoting bipod.
Exactly I’m twisting the stock and the bipod plants the front end and allows me to flex it.

I’m doing more than I would for the video, but when cycling as round I noticed it enough to be curious.
 
that does seem like a lot. on the left side of the rifle is the pressure relief hole just kiss the top of the stock inlet? the action may not be seated into the recoil lug properly.

I just hogged out my factory stock for more gap around my barrel and noticed I have a bit more flex init as well
I believe so.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9789.jpeg
    IMG_9789.jpeg
    159.7 KB · Views: 16
I’d say not normal, I use Harris and atlas bipods and I’ve never noticed enough flex on a tikka to do that.

My Ruger American rimfire is a different story, off a bipod it flexes and touches the barrel.
 
I guess this is the way it is.

Unless the inside of the stock looks different…I wouldn’t be able to screw the BA in any other way or incorrectly seat it.

Oh well, was looking at replacing this stock anyways.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9794.jpeg
    IMG_9794.jpeg
    305.3 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_9795.jpeg
    IMG_9795.jpeg
    352.9 KB · Views: 7
I had similar but not that much. I took my CTR and put it in a roughtech stock. The CTR mag sticking out the bottom didn't jive with my hunting situation. So I opened the barrel channel slightly with dremel and installed SS pillars. I now torque the standard plastic bottom metal to 65in-lb instead of 45. No issues, very little movement and hammer as it should. You'll notice i left the ss tubing long. I measured it so that the internal washer in bottom metal would bottom out on it. Thus having a solid mount from bottom metal to action. 20240826_132228.jpg20230828_145903.jpg20230828_145941.jpg20230828_145955.jpg20230828_150000.jpg20230828_150013.jpg20230828_150018.jpg20230828_150029.jpg20230828_150039.jpg20241018_111625.jpg
 
I had similar but not that much. I took my CTR and put it in a roughtech stock. The CTR mag sticking out the bottom didn't jive with my hunting situation. So I opened the barrel channel slightly with dremel and installed SS pillars. I now torque the standard plastic bottom metal to 65in-lb instead of 45. No issues, very little movement and hammer as it should. You'll notice i left the ss tubing long. I measured it so that the internal washer in bottom metal would bottom out on it. Thus having a solid mount from bottom metal to action. View attachment 1001761View attachment 1001762View attachment 1001763View attachment 1001764View attachment 1001765View attachment 1001766View attachment 1001767View attachment 1001768View attachment 1001769View attachment 1001770
Thank you for the pics and info.

I’m slighly exagerating the twist with my right hand to show the cant a but yeah, just seeing what’s tolerable .
 
Back
Top