Mike Islander
WKR
Went to our open island range last week and shot 100, 200, 300, 540. Sighted in at 100. Shooting a 6.5 CM Fieldcraft, 21" barrel with 6x42 SWFA fixed scope. Best ammo grouping was with Barnes VOR-TX 127 grain factory. At 100 it was easy to get 1/2 MOA. I sighted in at the pistol range, since we had a bit of wind and it was sheltered. Then I headed out to the longer range, which does have hedge to block some wind, but there is definitively more exposure.
I used my chronograph to get an average for 10 shots, which I can't remember and lives in Strelok on my tablet, which is sitting at home. Something tells me it was about 2785 fps. This seems reasonable, since the ammo is rated at 2825 fps in their test with longer barrel. In any case, I entered all the data in Strelok and it told me to dial 4 up (0.1 mils/click) for 200, 10 up for 300, and 30 up for 538.
Here are the results. Since there was a bit of wind, and I was not correcting for it at all. I'm fine with 200 and 300 and would feel very comfortable shooting deer-size game (or even coyotes) at that range. Poor trigger control with this ultralight rifle likely played a role in my "flyers". Certainly have shot much better than that before.
200 yards
300 yards
At 538 it was a different story. I aimed for the big blue tape square in the center of the four targets, which are just 8.5"x11" paper taped together. Ended up far right and high. I was having trouble resolving the blue square at that distance but still expected better. Wind was only about 5 mph and not a direct crosswind, so I don't think it could throw me that far right.
Went to see my eye doctor the next week and it turns out I have cataracts. Seeing double with one eye closed, etc. I know 500+ yards is pushing the resolution of the 6X scope, but I'm thinking I can do much better than this first try. What do you think? Getting surgery in a few weeks, so we will eventually find out.
I used my chronograph to get an average for 10 shots, which I can't remember and lives in Strelok on my tablet, which is sitting at home. Something tells me it was about 2785 fps. This seems reasonable, since the ammo is rated at 2825 fps in their test with longer barrel. In any case, I entered all the data in Strelok and it told me to dial 4 up (0.1 mils/click) for 200, 10 up for 300, and 30 up for 538.
Here are the results. Since there was a bit of wind, and I was not correcting for it at all. I'm fine with 200 and 300 and would feel very comfortable shooting deer-size game (or even coyotes) at that range. Poor trigger control with this ultralight rifle likely played a role in my "flyers". Certainly have shot much better than that before.
200 yards
300 yards
At 538 it was a different story. I aimed for the big blue tape square in the center of the four targets, which are just 8.5"x11" paper taped together. Ended up far right and high. I was having trouble resolving the blue square at that distance but still expected better. Wind was only about 5 mph and not a direct crosswind, so I don't think it could throw me that far right.
Went to see my eye doctor the next week and it turns out I have cataracts. Seeing double with one eye closed, etc. I know 500+ yards is pushing the resolution of the 6X scope, but I'm thinking I can do much better than this first try. What do you think? Getting surgery in a few weeks, so we will eventually find out.
Last edited: