billysmals
WKR
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2023
- Messages
- 828
I wanted to provide a review of the Darton Sequel 35 ST2 (I read the other thread which was awesome) with some measurements for those that geek out on that sort of thing. So DISCLAIMER: This is an archery nerd's review. It's long and detailed...so read on at your own risk! Split into Part 1 and 2....
I won’t post manufacturer specs, you can read that on Darton’s website. I’m also not going to go into the new technology for tuning as well, you can read that or watch the 1000 video’s online about it.
Affiliations Disclaimer-I don’t have any! No one asked or paid me. My opinions are my own. I ordered this bow in January and then had to cancel it after needing the money for something else. This bow was then gifted to me by family. So even though it was a gift it was paid for. All other products were purchased by me. Now onto the review!
For comparison I am going to compare to the current bow I am shooting: 2020 Bowtech Revolt X.
Where able I used a caliper to provide the measurements:
Darton Sequel 35 ST 2: measurements out of the box
ATA- 35.187 in (Advertised 35.125)
Brace- 6.31 in (Advertised 6.3)
Riser Length-34.125 in
Reflex-1.1-1inch
Weight- 4.85lbs with no stubby stabilizer, 5.05 with stubby stabilizer- (Advertised weight 4.78lbs)
Grip Thickness- 0.79 in
Grip Length- 1.37 in
Riser Shelf Width- 2.44 in
Limb Width- 2.82 in
Bowtech Revolt X:
ATA- 33.0625 (Advertised 33)
Brace- 6.5 in (Advertised 6.5)
Riser length- 29 in
Reflex- 0.66 in
Grip Thickness- 0.78 in
Grip Length- 1.26 in
Riser Shelf Width- 2.17 in
Limb Width- 3.09 in
Measurement Methodology:
ATA - measured from middle of axel screw to middle of axel screw.
Brace - measured from deepest part of the back of the grip to center of string.
Reflex -measured by placing a 36in ruler from the last point of limb contact of top/bottom limbs and then measuring from that line to the deepest part of the grip.
Riser Length -measured from the last point of limb contact with the limbs.
Riser Shelf -measured from the front edge of the riser shelf lip to the back of the riser where the rest is installed. I included this measurement as there were many reports of the riser and shelf being thicker on the darton sequels ST2’s interfering with rests mounted using the traditional side brackets. Reports were that the riser was so thick that it would max out the left windage to hit center shot.
Grip measurements: Simple calipers
Overall Thoughts On Measurements:
I was drawn to the Darton Sequel 35 ST2 for a lot of these measurements. I like long riser and long ATA bows as I feel the hold and balance well. I also like low reflex bows and was glad to see the Darton was under 2inches of reflex. The Bowtech shines here as it measured 0.66in. What was interesting to me comparing this to the Bowtech is the Darton feels much bigger, even though the ATA spec/measurement is 2 in more, 35in vs 33in. The riser on the Darton is 5inches longer (34in vs 29in) and gives the appearance of being much bigger than that. This is accomplished by near parallel limb geometry when compared to the Bowtech which has less parallel limbs and it’s geometry is more like some target bows. Specifically, the new Mathews Title has a 30in riser with 34in ATA, which is the same ratio as the Bowtech Revolt X at 29in riser and 33in ATA.
Weight:-I was concerned when starting this build the Darton being a 35in ATA that the weight would be significantly more than the bowtech.
The Bowtech fully set up: Redline RL2 5 pin .19 Dovetail Sight + QAD HDX Rest + Titanium Archery Products Stabilizer (TAP) 15in w/5oz with 10 degree Bee Stinger QD + Shrewd Atlas back bar mount QD with Bee Stinger Micro Hex 8in Stabilizer w/ 2oz = 6.78lbs.
The Darton fully set up: Axcel Driver Custom 4 pin .10 + Hamskea Everest COR Mount + TAP 15in w/5oz with TAP Gen 4 QD mount + Shrewd Atlas back bar mount QD with TAP 10in stabilizer w/ 2oz + TAP rear string stop suppressor = 6.9lbs
I used an Xpot Hanging Scale for these measurements.
I was pleasantly surprised that the darton was 0.12lbs (basically 1.6oz) heavier, even being at 35in ATA. I think this is due to the accessories mostly. The driver sight is super light compared to the Redline. Interestingly the bee stinger micro hex 8in stab with 2 oz weighed almost exactly the same as the TAP 10in stab w/2 oz. I think the hamskea Everest weighs more than the QAD HDX, but I can’t not confirm this. I would have liked to weigh the both bows bare, but the bowtech is going to be my backup on my fall hunt and I didn’t want to deconstruct it all just for this measurement. Overall, I’m really happy that the Darton fully set up is only about 1.6oz more than the bowtech.
SUBJECTIVE TIME! Just my thoughts, your mileage may vary!
Grip
Darton: It feels good to me. Not like a “WOW this is sooo much better than anything els…” It just feels good. It’s got decently squared off edges to be repeatable without being uncomfortable. The angle is more low wrist. It is thickish feeling, which I prefer as my hand is relaxed when making contact at the front with my fingers. Too thin and it caused me to close my hand and I induce more torque. What feels really good is the riser shelf provides more portectioin for my fingers. It feels like a Bee Real UV grip here. The shelf extends and is really comfortable for the grip hand, no bumps or sore spots while shooting. Additionally, there is a machined groove in the front of the grip which provides a reference for your fingers when feeling the front of the grip.
Bowtech: I concede there more bias here as it’s most familiar. I like bowtech grips. I have the clutch raised heel and you can feel how the darton has more of a low wrist comparably. I prefer a slightly raised heel. The bowtech also feels more thin. This is why I measured this between bows as I wanted to see what it objectively measured at. It wasn’t as thin objectively as I felt to me subjectively, 1.26in bowtech vs 1.37in Darton. It’s amazing how the this small .11in difference feels so much smaller. The riser shelf here also feels much smaller. Switching back and forth it was obvious I prefer the Darton here. I used to shoot a Mathews v3X and I tried a Bee Real UV grip (both versions) and I really like the riser shelf feel on these grips. The darton is similar to the Bee Real grips and it’s really nice.
Overall I like the heel profile of the bowtech but the darton’s thickness and riser shelf is really really nice. I’m not sure if one is better or worse here. I never had a problem setting my grip with the Bowtech, and the darton is no different as my hand finds the position easily. I will say the machined groove on the front of the darton is a huge win as it proves a repeatable tactile place I can touch for my front fingers. Kudos to darton for this and it’s something I wish all manufactures would take note of. It’s simple and it works.
Fit and Finish:
I chose the Ursi 2.0 camo initially on my order in January and was out of stock. This is not showing as an option on Darton’s website currently (it was at the time of my order), but you can still find this option at Lancaster and Podium Archery. I am unsure why Darton doesn’t list it as a camo option on their website. I liked the Ursi camo over the other camo options from Darton. I almost chose the Folds of Honor edition because I like to support our military veterans, and I liked the camo pattern, but the camo seemed too tanned out for me. The Ursi camo looks pretty sweet to me and overall I’m happy with it. It’s more forrest/and fern green than I had initially thought. I ordered a Kuiu Verde 2.0 tight spot thinking it would be close, but the difference is much more striking. The Kuiu has a lot more gray/blue ish, and the green is more olive. I do like the Ursi, but if darton had used Kuiu Verde 2.0 I would have chosen that. The camo finish is good not great. There are a couple of spots that look like the hydro dip (which is what I’m sure they use) didn’t apply as much or someone touched it while it was wet. I included some pictures of these locations which appear on the back of the riser where the integrated rest mounts and also on the front of the grip near the front edge of the riser shelf. I can’t compare to other companies in this area.
I won’t post manufacturer specs, you can read that on Darton’s website. I’m also not going to go into the new technology for tuning as well, you can read that or watch the 1000 video’s online about it.
Affiliations Disclaimer-I don’t have any! No one asked or paid me. My opinions are my own. I ordered this bow in January and then had to cancel it after needing the money for something else. This bow was then gifted to me by family. So even though it was a gift it was paid for. All other products were purchased by me. Now onto the review!
For comparison I am going to compare to the current bow I am shooting: 2020 Bowtech Revolt X.
Where able I used a caliper to provide the measurements:
Darton Sequel 35 ST 2: measurements out of the box
ATA- 35.187 in (Advertised 35.125)
Brace- 6.31 in (Advertised 6.3)
Riser Length-34.125 in
Reflex-1.1-1inch
Weight- 4.85lbs with no stubby stabilizer, 5.05 with stubby stabilizer- (Advertised weight 4.78lbs)
Grip Thickness- 0.79 in
Grip Length- 1.37 in
Riser Shelf Width- 2.44 in
Limb Width- 2.82 in
Bowtech Revolt X:
ATA- 33.0625 (Advertised 33)
Brace- 6.5 in (Advertised 6.5)
Riser length- 29 in
Reflex- 0.66 in
Grip Thickness- 0.78 in
Grip Length- 1.26 in
Riser Shelf Width- 2.17 in
Limb Width- 3.09 in
Measurement Methodology:
ATA - measured from middle of axel screw to middle of axel screw.
Brace - measured from deepest part of the back of the grip to center of string.
Reflex -measured by placing a 36in ruler from the last point of limb contact of top/bottom limbs and then measuring from that line to the deepest part of the grip.
Riser Length -measured from the last point of limb contact with the limbs.
Riser Shelf -measured from the front edge of the riser shelf lip to the back of the riser where the rest is installed. I included this measurement as there were many reports of the riser and shelf being thicker on the darton sequels ST2’s interfering with rests mounted using the traditional side brackets. Reports were that the riser was so thick that it would max out the left windage to hit center shot.
Grip measurements: Simple calipers
Overall Thoughts On Measurements:
I was drawn to the Darton Sequel 35 ST2 for a lot of these measurements. I like long riser and long ATA bows as I feel the hold and balance well. I also like low reflex bows and was glad to see the Darton was under 2inches of reflex. The Bowtech shines here as it measured 0.66in. What was interesting to me comparing this to the Bowtech is the Darton feels much bigger, even though the ATA spec/measurement is 2 in more, 35in vs 33in. The riser on the Darton is 5inches longer (34in vs 29in) and gives the appearance of being much bigger than that. This is accomplished by near parallel limb geometry when compared to the Bowtech which has less parallel limbs and it’s geometry is more like some target bows. Specifically, the new Mathews Title has a 30in riser with 34in ATA, which is the same ratio as the Bowtech Revolt X at 29in riser and 33in ATA.
Weight:-I was concerned when starting this build the Darton being a 35in ATA that the weight would be significantly more than the bowtech.
The Bowtech fully set up: Redline RL2 5 pin .19 Dovetail Sight + QAD HDX Rest + Titanium Archery Products Stabilizer (TAP) 15in w/5oz with 10 degree Bee Stinger QD + Shrewd Atlas back bar mount QD with Bee Stinger Micro Hex 8in Stabilizer w/ 2oz = 6.78lbs.
The Darton fully set up: Axcel Driver Custom 4 pin .10 + Hamskea Everest COR Mount + TAP 15in w/5oz with TAP Gen 4 QD mount + Shrewd Atlas back bar mount QD with TAP 10in stabilizer w/ 2oz + TAP rear string stop suppressor = 6.9lbs
I used an Xpot Hanging Scale for these measurements.
I was pleasantly surprised that the darton was 0.12lbs (basically 1.6oz) heavier, even being at 35in ATA. I think this is due to the accessories mostly. The driver sight is super light compared to the Redline. Interestingly the bee stinger micro hex 8in stab with 2 oz weighed almost exactly the same as the TAP 10in stab w/2 oz. I think the hamskea Everest weighs more than the QAD HDX, but I can’t not confirm this. I would have liked to weigh the both bows bare, but the bowtech is going to be my backup on my fall hunt and I didn’t want to deconstruct it all just for this measurement. Overall, I’m really happy that the Darton fully set up is only about 1.6oz more than the bowtech.
SUBJECTIVE TIME! Just my thoughts, your mileage may vary!
Grip
Darton: It feels good to me. Not like a “WOW this is sooo much better than anything els…” It just feels good. It’s got decently squared off edges to be repeatable without being uncomfortable. The angle is more low wrist. It is thickish feeling, which I prefer as my hand is relaxed when making contact at the front with my fingers. Too thin and it caused me to close my hand and I induce more torque. What feels really good is the riser shelf provides more portectioin for my fingers. It feels like a Bee Real UV grip here. The shelf extends and is really comfortable for the grip hand, no bumps or sore spots while shooting. Additionally, there is a machined groove in the front of the grip which provides a reference for your fingers when feeling the front of the grip.
Bowtech: I concede there more bias here as it’s most familiar. I like bowtech grips. I have the clutch raised heel and you can feel how the darton has more of a low wrist comparably. I prefer a slightly raised heel. The bowtech also feels more thin. This is why I measured this between bows as I wanted to see what it objectively measured at. It wasn’t as thin objectively as I felt to me subjectively, 1.26in bowtech vs 1.37in Darton. It’s amazing how the this small .11in difference feels so much smaller. The riser shelf here also feels much smaller. Switching back and forth it was obvious I prefer the Darton here. I used to shoot a Mathews v3X and I tried a Bee Real UV grip (both versions) and I really like the riser shelf feel on these grips. The darton is similar to the Bee Real grips and it’s really nice.
Overall I like the heel profile of the bowtech but the darton’s thickness and riser shelf is really really nice. I’m not sure if one is better or worse here. I never had a problem setting my grip with the Bowtech, and the darton is no different as my hand finds the position easily. I will say the machined groove on the front of the darton is a huge win as it proves a repeatable tactile place I can touch for my front fingers. Kudos to darton for this and it’s something I wish all manufactures would take note of. It’s simple and it works.
Fit and Finish:
I chose the Ursi 2.0 camo initially on my order in January and was out of stock. This is not showing as an option on Darton’s website currently (it was at the time of my order), but you can still find this option at Lancaster and Podium Archery. I am unsure why Darton doesn’t list it as a camo option on their website. I liked the Ursi camo over the other camo options from Darton. I almost chose the Folds of Honor edition because I like to support our military veterans, and I liked the camo pattern, but the camo seemed too tanned out for me. The Ursi camo looks pretty sweet to me and overall I’m happy with it. It’s more forrest/and fern green than I had initially thought. I ordered a Kuiu Verde 2.0 tight spot thinking it would be close, but the difference is much more striking. The Kuiu has a lot more gray/blue ish, and the green is more olive. I do like the Ursi, but if darton had used Kuiu Verde 2.0 I would have chosen that. The camo finish is good not great. There are a couple of spots that look like the hydro dip (which is what I’m sure they use) didn’t apply as much or someone touched it while it was wet. I included some pictures of these locations which appear on the back of the riser where the integrated rest mounts and also on the front of the grip near the front edge of the riser shelf. I can’t compare to other companies in this area.
Attachments
-
IMG_9131.JPG380.3 KB · Views: 13
-
IMG_9176.JPG356.3 KB · Views: 13
-
IMG_9175.JPG204.6 KB · Views: 15
-
IMG_9174.JPG207 KB · Views: 13
-
IMG_9172.jpg677.2 KB · Views: 12
-
IMG_9166.JPG324.3 KB · Views: 12
-
IMG_9135.JPG201.3 KB · Views: 12
-
IMG_9134.JPG224.5 KB · Views: 13
-
IMG_9133.JPG200.4 KB · Views: 12
-
IMG_9132.JPG247.2 KB · Views: 12