Anyone else bothered by NON-RES Alien's applying in the States

[Okhotnik]

It's all of our public wildlife and non residents have every right to pay and enjoy hunting in any state. Hunter diversity creates progress.

Creating diversity quotas and implementing DEI can only increase our wildlife herds and public lands opportunities .


A good start would be only 28 per cent of tags allocation issued in Montana to straight white CIS males. The remaining tags go to non resident diversity quotas with license fees determined on a perceived discrimination table with white CIS males paying a 100 per cent. Rainbow diversity would explode and I would love to see more diverse hunters along with wolves

Are you in with me?

 

[MallardSX2]

I don't think anyone who is not a US citizen should be able to obtain tags through any of our draws.


So yes, it bothers me.

 

[jmez]

Are federal taxes used to manage lands in states?

Yep, and I don't care who gets the tags.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

 

[Okhotnik]

Yep, and I don't care who gets the tags.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

So if 28 million people from China, Croatia, Japan, Mexico, Brasil applied for non res elk and Deer tags in Western states you would be fine with that?n How about if they flew over and started pheasant and deer hunting and fishing in SD?

Would you give up your tag for more diverse hunting in your state lol

 

[Mykolaivka887]

So if 28 million people from China, Croatia, Japan, Mexico, Brasil applied for non res elk and Deer tags in Western states you would be fine with that?

Well, I can say that 28 million foreign nationals aren't going to submit draw permit applications for American wapiti.

 

[Pacific_Fork]

Ever hunted CA? 28 million non citizens in A Zone alone.

 

[Mykolaivka887]

Ever hunted CA? 28 million non citizens in A Zone alone.

That's funny (lol).

 

[Hippie Steve]

Creating diversity quotas and implementing DEI can only increase our wildlife herds and public lands opportunities .


A good start would be only 28 per cent of tags allocation issued in Montana to straight white CIS males. The remaining tags go to non resident diversity quotas with license fees determined on a perceived discrimination table with white CIS males paying a 100 per cent. Rainbow diversity would explode and I would love to see more diverse hunters along with wolves

Are you in with me?

Settle down man you're getting into a hypocritical conservative workup. Who cares what type or color of people get tags, state's cap non residents to a quota and everyone should have an opportunity. The world isn't white man it's just a different shade of brown.

 

[Okhotnik]

Settle down man you're getting into a hypocritical conservative workup. Who cares what type or color of people get tags, state's cap non residents to a quota and everyone should have an opportunity. The world isn't white man it's just a different shade of brown.

So what groups are preventing non resident diverse groups from applying for tags in your make believe oppressive, racist hunting world? lol I see the DEI mind virus in many of your posts yet you choose to live in one of the least diverse states in the US. So your hysterical posts demanding racial equity in hunting are always good for a chuckle

 

[jmez]

So if 28 million people from China, Croatia, Japan, Mexico, Brasil applied for non res elk and Deer tags in Western states you would be fine with that?n How about if they flew over and started pheasant and deer hunting and fishing in SD?

Would you give up your tag for more diverse hunting in your state lol

Again I don't care who gets them.

What does people taking non resident tags have to do with my pheasant hunting in SD. I don't deer hunt anymore. Fishing licenses are unlimited last I knew.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

 

[Hippie Steve]

So what groups are preventing non resident diverse groups from applying for tags in your make believe oppressive, racist hunting world? lol I see the DEI mind virus in many of your posts yet you choose to live in one of the least diverse states in the US. So your hysterical posts demanding racial equity in hunting are always good for a chuckle

Your comments speak volumes of what you believe in. I'm glad you find humor in my posts.

 

[Weldor]

Wasn't there a similar issue years ago with Kansas, no non resident deer hunting? When surrounding states would not allow anyone from Kansas to hunt in their state, got changed real quick?

 

[Borofsky]

I’m with you that seems like crap!