An interesting article on what will be a very hard fight

Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
991
They're getting exactly what they voted for
You say this as if hunters voted for these politicians.
That’s not how it works in Washington. Seattle and King county do our voting for us. The liberals in the Seattle metro outnumber pretty well all the conservatives in the entire state.
Oregon is similar with Portland and Salem.
That’s why the east sides of these states talk of splitting off and joining Idaho.

With Boise growing exponentially Idaho may soon follow suit.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
3,574
Location
Western Iowa
You say this as if hunters voted for these politicians.
That’s not how it works in Washington. Seattle and King county do our voting for us. The liberals in the Seattle metro outnumber pretty well all the conservatives in the entire state.
Oregon is similar with Portland and Salem.
That’s why the east sides of these states talk of splitting off and joining Idaho.

With Boise growing exponentially Idaho may soon follow suit.
That goes for a number of states. Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, etc... Metro populations vote for all and minimize the lifestyles and values of anyone outside the greater metropolitan area. It would be an interesting experiment for them to become city states, wholly dependent on surrounding "rural states" for ALL of their food security for example.
 
Joined
Sep 28, 2018
Messages
2,216
Location
VA
At the bottom of this page they include an email address to report any factual errors. I debated sending an email, but I only read a little of their site and found it to be nearly devoid of fact. So I guess I'll save the energy and skip sending an email they wont even read. It pains me to see people display such willful ignorance.

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk

Might be easier to run a DOS attack on their website and email servers
 
Joined
Sep 13, 2016
Messages
2,413
Location
Idaho
The exact reason for their push to introduce wolves, ban cat hunting, ban bear hunting, etc. Been saying it for years and here it is.
I had a retired IFG CO as a teacher in the late 80's . He flat out claimed the same exact thing. Everyone claimed he was an out of touch kook. I was really too young to understand where he was going, but later on, I connected all the dots and his thoughts are turning up right. These guys are playing the long game, while we are arguing about lighted nocks, and long range shooting. Although I would argue, are numbers are not nearly strong enough to overcome the urban centers and their migration out of their self created mess.
 

TheTone

WKR
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
1,787
I had a retired IFG CO as a teacher in the late 80's . He flat out claimed the same exact thing. Everyone claimed he was an out of touch kook. I was really too young to understand where he was going, but later on, I connected all the dots and his thoughts are turning up right. These guys are playing the long game, while we are arguing about lighted nocks, and long range shooting. Although I would argue, are numbers are not nearly strong enough to overcome the urban centers and their migration out of their self created mess.
Was his name Gene? Did he wear a hat lined in foil?
 

Marble

WKR
Joined
May 29, 2019
Messages
3,579
I had a retired IFG CO as a teacher in the late 80's . He flat out claimed the same exact thing. Everyone claimed he was an out of touch kook. I was really too young to understand where he was going, but later on, I connected all the dots and his thoughts are turning up right. These guys are playing the long game, while we are arguing about lighted nocks, and long range shooting. Although I would argue, are numbers are not nearly strong enough to overcome the urban centers and their migration out of their self created mess.
You're right, hunter numbers are small compared to the rest of the population. But when compared to the crazies that want this passed, I'm guessing it's pretty comparable. It takes organizations like "Howl for Wildlife"
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/ to step up and organize us hunters to have a voice.

If you are not a member there, sign up for their emails and they will notify you when you can do something. Usually it's a just clicking a link and sending an email to some representative.

These animal rights organizations have tried to ban all hunting in Oregon, bear hunting in California and Washington and have been trying to put limits on hunting more and more all over the country.

People do not understand incrementalism. The slippery slope. This is why I was so against a mandate for copper only, background checks for all ammo, taxes added specifically to ammo. All of these little things add up and contribute to, the frustrations of the people who would be normally be very vocal against these laws.

I hope that it stays status quo in WA.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
 

Sled

WKR
Joined
Jun 11, 2018
Messages
2,265
Location
Utah
That goes for a number of states. Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, etc... Metro populations vote for all and minimize the lifestyles and values of anyone outside the greater metropolitan area. It would be an interesting experiment for them to become city states, wholly dependent on surrounding "rural states" for ALL of their food security for example.

Nevada could have this problem real soon. Vegas does the voting there. I'm glad Utah put hunting in their constitution. More states should try to preserve it now while there's still a chance.
 

M-Wig

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
108
Location
Texas
It is difficult to understand the priorities of some anti-hunting groups. Is it to help wildlife or is it to end/alter the sport of hunting?
I've read plenty of articles over the years detailing these groups. Many of them don't have a problem with killing animals if needed, they just don't want someone doing it for recreation.

Ex. Whitetail deer overpopulate in a suburban area. They would be fine with the local government paying someone to shoot them. Against allowing hunters the opportunity.
 

elkyinzer

WKR
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
1,257
Location
Pennslyvania
Can someone find a way to fit hunters into the identity-based persecution, throw their own tactics back at them? I identify as a hunter. I have ancestral hunting traits that I need to exercise or else I feel marginalized.

It just seems like the science-based conservation approach is a little too malleable to be the hill we are willing to die on.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
3,574
Location
Western Iowa
I've read plenty of articles over the years detailing these groups. Many of them don't have a problem with killing animals if needed, they just don't want someone doing it for recreation.

Ex. Whitetail deer overpopulate in a suburban area. They would be fine with the local government paying someone to shoot them. Against allowing hunters the opportunity.
They already do that all over the country. Iowa City, IA, has had "sharpshooters" controlling urban deer herds for years. The libs over in that part of the state don't believe that us "fuds" can hit our targets without wounded deer wandering around the cities. In contrast, the somewhat less liberal Des Moines city leaders have supported urban bow hunts for many years now.
 

wapitibob

WKR
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
5,936
Location
Bend Oregon
A cpl key points.

".... a new majority of the Washington commission doesn’t recognize those pleas as a problem. They’re among an insurgent type of wildlife official that wants to transform state fish-and-game departments across the country into agencies that “emphasize the intrinsic value of individual animals and healthy ecosystems.”

"But with the appointment earlier this year of three “preservationist” commissioners in Washington, reformers now hold a 5-4 majority on the board. In March, they succeeded in closing Washington’s spring bear season, despite recommendations from agency staff that the hunt was ecologically sustainable and despite opposition from Thorburn and three other commissioners."
 
Top