- Thread Starter
- #21
Several on this site would call you the same thing.
Sent from my moto g power (2021) using Tapatalk
Let them.
Several on this site would call you the same thing.
Sent from my moto g power (2021) using Tapatalk
You say this as if hunters voted for these politicians.They're getting exactly what they voted for
That goes for a number of states. Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, etc... Metro populations vote for all and minimize the lifestyles and values of anyone outside the greater metropolitan area. It would be an interesting experiment for them to become city states, wholly dependent on surrounding "rural states" for ALL of their food security for example.You say this as if hunters voted for these politicians.
That’s not how it works in Washington. Seattle and King county do our voting for us. The liberals in the Seattle metro outnumber pretty well all the conservatives in the entire state.
Oregon is similar with Portland and Salem.
That’s why the east sides of these states talk of splitting off and joining Idaho.
With Boise growing exponentially Idaho may soon follow suit.
At the bottom of this page they include an email address to report any factual errors. I debated sending an email, but I only read a little of their site and found it to be nearly devoid of fact. So I guess I'll save the energy and skip sending an email they wont even read. It pains me to see people display such willful ignorance.
Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
I had a retired IFG CO as a teacher in the late 80's . He flat out claimed the same exact thing. Everyone claimed he was an out of touch kook. I was really too young to understand where he was going, but later on, I connected all the dots and his thoughts are turning up right. These guys are playing the long game, while we are arguing about lighted nocks, and long range shooting. Although I would argue, are numbers are not nearly strong enough to overcome the urban centers and their migration out of their self created mess.The exact reason for their push to introduce wolves, ban cat hunting, ban bear hunting, etc. Been saying it for years and here it is.
Was his name Gene? Did he wear a hat lined in foil?I had a retired IFG CO as a teacher in the late 80's . He flat out claimed the same exact thing. Everyone claimed he was an out of touch kook. I was really too young to understand where he was going, but later on, I connected all the dots and his thoughts are turning up right. These guys are playing the long game, while we are arguing about lighted nocks, and long range shooting. Although I would argue, are numbers are not nearly strong enough to overcome the urban centers and their migration out of their self created mess.
You're right, hunter numbers are small compared to the rest of the population. But when compared to the crazies that want this passed, I'm guessing it's pretty comparable. It takes organizations like "Howl for Wildlife"I had a retired IFG CO as a teacher in the late 80's . He flat out claimed the same exact thing. Everyone claimed he was an out of touch kook. I was really too young to understand where he was going, but later on, I connected all the dots and his thoughts are turning up right. These guys are playing the long game, while we are arguing about lighted nocks, and long range shooting. Although I would argue, are numbers are not nearly strong enough to overcome the urban centers and their migration out of their self created mess.
That goes for a number of states. Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, etc... Metro populations vote for all and minimize the lifestyles and values of anyone outside the greater metropolitan area. It would be an interesting experiment for them to become city states, wholly dependent on surrounding "rural states" for ALL of their food security for example.
Did you see in Argentina the Mt lion population has started to hunt together. Similar to lion prides in Africa.400 Strong Super Pack of Wolves Threatening Remote Siberian Village
Is this what they want with some lions and bears thrown in for good measure?
I've read plenty of articles over the years detailing these groups. Many of them don't have a problem with killing animals if needed, they just don't want someone doing it for recreation.It is difficult to understand the priorities of some anti-hunting groups. Is it to help wildlife or is it to end/alter the sport of hunting?
They already do that all over the country. Iowa City, IA, has had "sharpshooters" controlling urban deer herds for years. The libs over in that part of the state don't believe that us "fuds" can hit our targets without wounded deer wandering around the cities. In contrast, the somewhat less liberal Des Moines city leaders have supported urban bow hunts for many years now.I've read plenty of articles over the years detailing these groups. Many of them don't have a problem with killing animals if needed, they just don't want someone doing it for recreation.
Ex. Whitetail deer overpopulate in a suburban area. They would be fine with the local government paying someone to shoot them. Against allowing hunters the opportunity.
It's pretty easy to scoff at conspiracy theorists. Although it seems to be happening in real time in Washington.Was his name Gene? Did he wear a hat lined in foil?