JustSomeGuy35
WKR
Hey guys, hopefully some of you can help square me away.
After much research and deliberation, I recently bought one of the demo SWFA 3-9x42's. I ordered the Mil-quad because that was the only type available. It came in today and I was surprised to find that I received the Mil-dot version instead. Website, invoice, and box all say MQ but the scope is definitely mil-dot.
I'm not disappointed though. I was a little concerned about how the MQ reticle would perform in low-light conditions. I guess I don't need to worry about that anymore haha.
Anyways.....
Details:
I bought this scope with the intention of putting it on my Rem 700 ADL 30-06. This rifle is a backup for my primary hunting rig and will be used for deer, elk, and bear, with shots being kept under 450 yds. I plan to zero at 100 yds, dial for elevation, and use the reticle for wind-holds.
It is currently wearing a Nikon Monarch 3 2.5-10x42 with medium Talley rings. I originally bought low rings but the bolt handle was rubbing against the Butler Creek cap on the eyepiece. I've gotten used to dialing so I don't want a BDC reticle on this rifle anymore.
Based on info gleamed from various posts made by Formidilosus and others, I was thinking about mounting the SWFA using Burris XTR two-piece bases and either Warne Mountain Tech or Seekins rings. Supposedly this combination can handle a lot of abuse.
So here are my questions:
1) Does anybody have this same setup (swfa 3-9 on 700 LA)?? If so, what type/style of base and ring height did you go with?
2) What two-piece bases do you guys recommend? Since this is an ADL model (blind mag), I don't want to install a one-piece rail unless there is a significant advantage to doing so.
3) Do any of you think I should fuss with bedding the bases? I checked the Talley rings with the bars from my lapping kit and they lined up exact. After mounting the Nikon, I went out back to zero and 1st shot was less than 1.75" from point of aim. I took that as meaning the receiver was tapped well enough. I'm not an expert though so figured I should ask!
Thank you in advance for whatever info, suggestions, or insights you guys care to offer! The community here on Rokslide has really helped me to take my hunting and shooting game to the next level. I truly appreciate you guys!
After much research and deliberation, I recently bought one of the demo SWFA 3-9x42's. I ordered the Mil-quad because that was the only type available. It came in today and I was surprised to find that I received the Mil-dot version instead. Website, invoice, and box all say MQ but the scope is definitely mil-dot.
I'm not disappointed though. I was a little concerned about how the MQ reticle would perform in low-light conditions. I guess I don't need to worry about that anymore haha.
Anyways.....
Details:
I bought this scope with the intention of putting it on my Rem 700 ADL 30-06. This rifle is a backup for my primary hunting rig and will be used for deer, elk, and bear, with shots being kept under 450 yds. I plan to zero at 100 yds, dial for elevation, and use the reticle for wind-holds.
It is currently wearing a Nikon Monarch 3 2.5-10x42 with medium Talley rings. I originally bought low rings but the bolt handle was rubbing against the Butler Creek cap on the eyepiece. I've gotten used to dialing so I don't want a BDC reticle on this rifle anymore.
Based on info gleamed from various posts made by Formidilosus and others, I was thinking about mounting the SWFA using Burris XTR two-piece bases and either Warne Mountain Tech or Seekins rings. Supposedly this combination can handle a lot of abuse.
So here are my questions:
1) Does anybody have this same setup (swfa 3-9 on 700 LA)?? If so, what type/style of base and ring height did you go with?
2) What two-piece bases do you guys recommend? Since this is an ADL model (blind mag), I don't want to install a one-piece rail unless there is a significant advantage to doing so.
3) Do any of you think I should fuss with bedding the bases? I checked the Talley rings with the bars from my lapping kit and they lined up exact. After mounting the Nikon, I went out back to zero and 1st shot was less than 1.75" from point of aim. I took that as meaning the receiver was tapped well enough. I'm not an expert though so figured I should ask!
Thank you in advance for whatever info, suggestions, or insights you guys care to offer! The community here on Rokslide has really helped me to take my hunting and shooting game to the next level. I truly appreciate you guys!
