To no one's surprise, you're getting a lot of mixed reviews. I'm actually surprised nobody's chimed in yet to tell you she should be shooting a suppressed a 223 instead of that old, over-bored Fudd gun she's got ;)
In all seriousness, though, it sounds like YOU'RE a bit uneasy with the 120's...
I think 7 SAUM is a beautiful sweet spot of all around killing capability paired with manageable recoil. I really wish they were easier to own.
I wouldn't see a need for bigger, so I'd go smaller for deer on down. No reason not to jump on that 6/6.5 creedmore train to handle small and medium...
I get that it reduces recoil, and that's cool, but that still falls way short of justifying the cost of entry and hassle of carrying it. Seems much simpler to just buy a hunting rifle with recoil that's manageable for whatever shooting you need to do with it. I keep my purchases at or below...
Suppressors for hunting are dumb. It's an overpriced tube that makes your rifle heavy, ungainly, and unsightly. It's not for your hearing protection - you can accomplish that for 1% of the price. It's an excuse for you to buy something because you think it's cool.
I assume you're asking why i don't make BOTH of my lots into food plots? If that's the question, then the answer is simple - one of them has to be my campsite. I wouldn't get much hunting done if I had to drive two hours from my house every morning.
Yeti coolers are for people with more money than brains. Unless your transporting human organs, $300 coolers are as wasteful as a sprinkler in the desert.
I don't subscribe to that philosophy, either. Passing on something on day 1 means I get more days hunting, and it's more important to enjoy my days on the hunt than it is to end the hunt successfully.