I love everything I’ve bought from Midway USA’s house brand. I didn’t need bibs by the time I discovered them, but I have a jacket, a heavy coat, and some merino base layers from them and it’s all great, especially for the money!
I was and continue to be shockingly pleased with my very inexpensive merino from Midway USA (their brand). So much so that I then bought a cheap jacket and a coat from them, which are also very nice for the money, and plan to buy more merino this year.
I’m not necessarily concerned about it, it’s just not my preference out of the options available. If I’m spending the money already, I wouldn’t mind having something I could learn to to dial with/target shoot at further distances than I hunt/be able to use it if I ever hunt a different environment
TLDR: would you rather have a 3-9x40 with a more useful reticle, or would a 2.5-10x56 of the same scope have enough of a light gathering/eye box advantage to be worth having a less preferred reticle?
Hi, long time lurker, but just registered.
I hunt the southeast, and do a lot of tree stand/ground blind stuff with typical shots being a less than 200 yards. I want a decent scope for an old .270 Savage 111 (eventually want to upgrade to a Tikka, but good glass is first priority. Lit reticle...