Yep. The same tired bs with a new thread cloaked under “just wanted to add a poll…” as if there is confusion what people think. Some just need to feel relevant and stir pots and beat dead horses and whatever other cliche term can be used.
What honest answers didn’t you get? I voted “Yes” in your poll. If a state chooses that is in their best interest I support that. I can then choose to hunt there or not hunt there based on what they decide. It’s not that difficult.
One thing I promise not to do though is ever try to change...
We aren’t. What issues in your state are Wyoming residents trying to change? I’m guessing the answer to that is none. Your glass house analogy doesn’t work in that case.
Kinda like every other thread on this topic you mean? I’m surprised someone thought we needed a THIRD thread started on this when two others are still on page 1.
I think some of the Wyoming guys being so vocal is because people from, say, Alabama come out here and it’s far different than walking 100 yards across the back yard to the tree stand and they then feel they should affect change without learning the culture or what makes this state desirable to...
Before we put too much credence in his statements let’s remember this is the same author of other great threads such as being against horses in areas he can’t take his SxS (because that too “isn’t fair”) drove his SxS 20,000 miles or whatever it was in one of the best units in the state and...
Everyone complaining about the Federal land restriction realizes it’s not ALL Federal land right? Just a small percentage?
You also can’t just go hunt Ferlderally owned Reservation land. Is that of issue as well?
It’s not just the Outfitters that benefit from this. Sure, the Outfitters have a strong lobby in Wyoming but Wyoming is a strong proponent of the Wyoming resident and know we need to get away from the guys from Alabama on their SxS. Every state should be of the same mindset.