At this point, I could care less about SC. If anyone thinking about using them does their research, they've got enough info to look and shop elsewhere. What's really unfortunate though is all the clueless IFE's who purposely come on here and repeat completely FALSE information out of ignorance...
Like I said, this is futile. Y'all are proof that you can't fix "stupid." Anyone with half a brain, the capacity for reading comprehension and critical thinking sees that you're all a bunch of blowhard IFE's who clearly know very little about what you're claiming. I don't need to "brush up"...
And anybody who believes this should just go back and read through his posts and see the thread about the independent suppressor reviews. You'll see he's full of crap.
First of all, many of the regulations you are using to defend your ridiculous case ARE NOT the actual code and are a summary of codes which don't even apply. Suppressors are regulated by the NFA and do not fall into the same category as most firearms. That is why you have to get a stamp, etc...
That's because he used to be one of the biggest SC leg-humpers but after a bad CS experience he needs an excuse to save face. So, he likes to claim the Banish isn't even a good can, despite the fact that an objective, independent comparison of many suppressors on the market showed it to be one...
OMFG!!!!!:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: Have you ever purchased a firearm or are you just some blowhard attorney who doubles down on stupid rather than admit you're wrong???? There's a word for those kind of people you know...DEMOCRATS!! A 4473, as anyone on this forum who has...
I'm gonna say this one more time and then I'm done here. You can't simply make *hit up to try and be right which is what you are doing. Additionally, you have NOT posted the entire code section that pertains to the argument at hand. Perhaps, this is intentional or perhaps it is an oversight...
You're getting warmer but still not there. You are correct that my argument is that 8 and 9 can occur PRIOR to stamp approval. However, you INCORRECT in stating that it can't be sent UNTIL the background check has been completed. IT DOES NOT SAY THAT ANYWHERE. You are reading that into the...
Tell ya what, post all the regulations that you claim apply instead of bits and pieces that you are conflating, misinterpreting and making incorrect claims about and then I encourage EVERYONE to read them objectively without letting anyone sway you with their incorrect assertions. Those with...
Yeah, I do. Which is why it's futile to argue when I'm the only one capable of reading comprehension. Sadly, most of the rest of you think that because one poster puts up a code section which he has incorrectly interpreted, you all think he's right.🐑🐑
Uh, the Code section that 5811 does. Try to stay with us.
"Furthermore, 18 U.S.C. 922(t)(1) and its implementing regulations at 27 CFR 478.102(a) require a licensee to contact NICS for a background check prior to completion of a firearm transfer to an unlicensed person, and verify the identity...
This is futile. NOBODY does a background check when picking up a firearm. The background check is done prior. You sound like the attorneys for SC who are precisely the reason for all this BS. They misread and incorrectly interpret the sections and statutes and then "overprotect" their client...
You obviously are not reading the section you are using to defend SC. This section states that the licensee do a background check BEFORE selling a firearm. The subsequent statutes then provide EXCEPTIONS to that requirement which include: (1) If the applicant has an alternate permit(i.e. CCW)...
Well, apparently I'm not the only one who has complaints and issues with SC as a quick search shows at least half a doz threads on this forum alone with multiple posts from users who will never use them again. Meanwhile, other online dealers like Capitol Armory have NONE. How do you explain...
OK. I stand corrected then. But, I've never seen any indication of that. Nobody keeps track of what I end up selecting or purchasing. I've never seen anyone walking around making notes of what they "sell." And I've never felt pressured to purchase anything or got the sense that I was at a...
However, there is NOTHING which states that the licensee must wait for ATF approval before sending the CLEO letter. They could send it when they submit to ATF so that the wait times overlap but they're too cheap to waste a stamp on the rare off-chance that an applicant gets denied by ATF. CLEO...