Search results

  1. 2

    FX Chronograph

    Had the labradar. Didn’t do a side by side but velocity’s were very similar from previous readings on same load.
  2. 2

    FX Chronograph

    I have one. Still testing it out but impressed so far.
  3. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    Glad you bought and got extra. Now you so you can see for yourself. You having a 9.5” twist will be interesting to see if it stabilizes. The bullet I believe has a recommended 9” which is most likely why you ordered the 178s. Some of the easiest load development I’ve ever done on any bullet...
  4. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    Mike, yes it was.
  5. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    This is getting ridiculous gentlemen. Everyone keep posting results whatever they may be.
  6. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    @SnakeRiverEric in the posts above
  7. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    You assume I don’t know what you’re talking about. I’ve used those bullets with success too and others I know. Lately haven’t been liking the results. Do you think the guy with the 128 is lying? Just curious
  8. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    I agree with you on all bullets are prone to failure.
  9. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    Don’t you see a lot of lung missing?
  10. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    Wish I had pictures of that but I don’t and what I mean by that is the bullet hitting the hide blowing up underneath and nothing getting past the surface of the ribs into vitals. I believe that to be from too much velocity at close range. Also had one penetrate in the top of the back an inch...
  11. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    And I’ve seen hornadys and Berger’s blow up on the hide and ones that completely pencil.
  12. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    Were you using his bcs? Especially that 128, someone’s very upset by it
  13. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    Very little damage? It blew half of his lung off. Had it been 3-4,000 elevation it would’ve probably done even better. Sure was more than field tip damage that someone said it would be.
  14. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    My bull took 3 or 4 staggering steps, stopped knowing something was wrong. Tried to pick up his front leg and dropped dead. That was at 981yds. This was the 195.
  15. 2

    McGuire Ballistics 168gr Copper Rose

    Awesome. My impact velocity was 1833 and it opened up plenty at 700 ft at 981 yds.
  16. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    Well, I’ll probably never shoot the 128s. I have the 7mm 168s and I will report back here with my findings.
  17. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    You are correct. I was looking at the projection length. The design is different and there is no rubber tip like on the lazer. So that may or may not help. I think it does. Maybe you should try it out and see for yourself. That’s all you can do.
  18. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    Completely different design. the 128gr is over .300” longer than the cutting edge lazer 150. McGuire is 1.390” vs the 150 lazer at 1.069”
  19. 2

    McGuire ballistics review

    Absolutely good guy. Worth the cost for me. I just received the 7mm 168s. Can’t wait to shoot them
  20. 2

    Revic BLR10b Rangefinding Binoculars

    I have got the revics last Friday and have 12x42 nl pures. I’ve been doing low light tests along with contrast, resolution and color. These binos are pretty impressive. I can’t say they’re better than the swaro nl pures when It comes to edge to edge clarity but I sure wouldn’t feel handicapped...

Latest posts

Featured Video

Stats

Threads
357,058
Messages
3,772,939
Members
81,422
Latest member
hp3

Latest Articles

Top