I've killed enough with the 77 tmk to have an appreciation for it. It's become my go to. I've shot it a lot over the last few years, both hunting and just shooting. I still have a few 75 amax's left but the 77 tmk has essentially taken over.
I'm certainly quicker, and more accurate...especially...
Very true of me as well.
The action lightening of the Howa's is very interesting. I'm curious how much weight it took off.
The little Elude is pretty cool. The short forend kinda rules it out for my use (...maybe not...), and I prefer a stock in most cases, but my hat's off to the company for...
The nice thing about a chassis is the adjustability, option to configure/hang stuff like the light, and drop in fit for any barrel on the same action. I keep one for short 700's/clones as well so I've always got something to put one in.
Neither the stock or grip are anything special.
The...
Yesterday I changed the base on the .223AI from low Burris to a higher pic rail (also changed grip from thin ultralite to larger...probably not what it will end up with). All the kids are big enough now that they don't need it that low. I could shoot it but had to work to get down on it (same...
10% member. The 10/90 ratio will reverse if a change moves that order to the back of the line...grin...
Tip of the hat to UM for their customer service.
On changing them, I did the builds on mine to get exactly what I wanted. They were plenty functional in factory form, I had something I wanted, so I did the builds to get it. The barrels are all a lighter contour, Douglas contours are usually lighter than the same number from other makers...
I'd prefer lighter, but I was expecting ~28-30 ozs with all the fixin's, so I've got no problem with it.
I haven't kept up, but I recall that a "light" version may be produced later. I'll likely jump on that as soon as they're taking orders.
.308 feeding was good with factory bottom metal.
.223 feeding was fine with factory bottom metal. When I rebarreled to 223AI the feeding was very rough. Going to a milled follower helped some. AI mags fixed it.
.358 Win would feed but was never smooth. Milled follower helped some. AI mags made...
I switched a couple of M7's to Badger Ordnance Model 7 M5 bottom metal a few years back. It was a great improvement in feeding, especially the .223AI. For the standard rounds, MDT's flush fit 3 round AICS are really nice...
I'm in this camp as well. I've come to MUCH prefer a generic load, using a known bullet (on game performance/acceptable BC/available), with "good" accuracy in multiple rifles than the same bullet in a "tuned to one rifle" load that's .5 MOA tighter on grouping...but needs different...
This reminds me of my brother's friend in college that he brought home to visit. I don't remember where he was from but I "think" it was Trinidad or Tobago (?)...I could be wrong on that though.
Anyhow, my dad had a deer hanging and we were going to be cutting it up. He saw where it was shot...
I still have one chassis in use. I've used several others, but in each case went back to a stock. Main reasons for me "ditching a chassis" are:
1. Bolt manipulation - for second shots, it's not as smooth/quick for me to work the bolt from a thumb wrapped pistol grip as it is from a standard...
Latest pic:
Original pic:
Comparing the original reticle pic from your earlier post to the latest pic, it seems they reticles were aligned correctly originally. Is the offset from a physical shifting of one of the reticles or from parallax caused by alignment of view (or adjustment)...
6x42 on the nxs compact tube with capped windage and a reticle like Mavin's SHR Mil with only the inner floating dot illuminated and I'd be all over it. Losing the extra lenses and power adjustments of the NXS would get it even lighter with even fewer points of failure.
I'd like to see NF's 4.5x with a hunting reticle:
https://www.nightforceoptics.com/riflescopes/competition/competition-sr-fixed-45x24/
I've not used one or viewed the reticle other than online.