It might be because within the hunting line I don't think there's multiple monikers at the same grain mass.
In 6mm I'd throw the 108 elite hunter downrange and take the extra bump in self confidence for being "elite".
...then I'd go worry about something else
It doesn't mean I understand the application of any of it!
We have a few rifles that shoot bergers at animals. I've gone about it by knowing my twist rate, then looking through reloading data to see what bullet mass fits into 2850-2950fps. That narrows it down to two or three Berger bullets...
Are you guys selling your houses, gold, and investments for what you paid for them? It's a risk to buy something at the same price anyone else can, and then try to sell it for more. It's certainly not a dick move or anything more than a person gambling. Every single one of us gains from our own...
The bright side is that it's just as easy to change back. I think it lends itself to identifying a forgiving setup and separating bow hiccups from shooter.
If I saw the pictures correctly, this is the first system of the bunch that actually has little marks rather than me paint sharpie marking...
I have a bow medic cable press thing, I do not have a draw board. I can change strings on bows that are not past parallel. I have to slightly press my mach 34 to get those little clips out and I hate it.
I use the shop's press and board to check/adjust cam timing when I get new strings broken...
It's the ability to do it essentially on the line, in a minute, PLUS be able to tune in the window between shims.
I can tune an elite bow to three different arrow spines in the time it takes me to swap the 220 shims on my PSE. That ease leads to a willingness to constantly be tuning...