Search results
-
A
Why not more DIY “big eyes”?
Why would that be? Less margin of error? -
A
Why not more DIY “big eyes”?
Good point on them being smaller. On my spreadsheet the TSN-664 comes to 7.98 lbs after I add in the adapter's weight. They have 68.42 cm^2 so it's 8.57 cm^2/lb of performance. I had previously ruled them out as at 7.98 lbs makes the 80mm a no brainer weight-wise. I didn't think about dimensions... -
A
Why not more DIY “big eyes”?
I've decided I want to invest in a big eyes setup primarly for hunting, and secondarily use on the rifle range. I'm having a hard time trying to decide between the Kowa TSN-884 setup @ 10.64 lbs vs the Swarovski STS-80 setup @ 8.56 lbs. The TSN-884 has 121.64 cm^2 of surface area, while the...
Featured Video
Stats
Latest Articles
-
BIG Buck Stories with Travis & Robby
-
TT#39 John Barklow: Going Beyond the Gear and Honing Our Skillsets
-
Coros Vertix 2 GPS Watch Review
-
Sometimes It’s Like That
-
Zeiss Conquest HDX Review
-
Mules vs. Horses, Rangefinders, & Hippie Yoga
-
Kuiu Hip Quiver Review
-
Big Mule Deer then and now with David Rydell
-
TT#38 Saving a Buck with Robby Denning and Travis Hobbs
-
Wildlife In Colorado In Peril