I've got a few ideas, but non of them are realistic and probably won't work short or long term. 99.7% of us just know what we see in the field and what we want, but we honestly don't have the required knowledge or experience to successfully manage muleys. On the other hand I'm not sure the top...
Several years ago my Leica rangefinder took a dump. I contacted them and they said it was outside of the warranty period and they wouldn't even consider repairing it on my dime. I was left with a $900 paperweight and a sour feeling about it.
Their warranty on observation devices seems to be...
I think the early Hornady brass scared away a lot of folks from using the LRM case, but I've heard that LRM brass is now made by ADG? If that's true then it opens a few doors for folks.
The word is out for sure and most people aren't doing it due to reports of poor long term performance. Some people are having success and continue to choose a +P chamber but they're a tiny minority compared to those that choose a conventional chamber.
The only tool that our electrician needs is his mouth, he talks his way out of doing anything at all and his $250k worth of specialty EI&C tools just collect dust.
Good luck to your son!
Reliability and repeatability are what is required. Glass is pretty far down the list of what I demand from a scope. You could use that NXS to beat a VX6HD to death and it would still function correctly.
Huge magnification will just amplify mirage and other poor visibility conditions at very long range. I also think that selling a Nightforce to buy a Sightron is a poor choice for 783 other reasons.
A friend of a friend called in a small pack of wolves and actually killed one with his bow, I used to have a picture of it but lost it a few years ago.