I tried to having two once and it screwed me. I work around 60 hours a week, and there just wasn't time to get both of them going. I ended up with a less than ideal setup. Of course that was the year that I had the biggest public land muley I have ever seen at 40 yards.
A while ago I sent Threadz a set of strings I had twisted up so that they could spec them out. They got lost in the mail and we decided to shorten the cables by individually by a 16th for a total of half inch shorter. I fought with this set for quite a while (poundage started at 78 on 70lb...
I use to bare shaft at 50 and 60. However I would always have to slightly tweak my rest when I went to broadheads anyways. One time I forgot my IW practice head, and used some Allen heads I found at the range. I broadhead tuned with those and found that I wasn't even close when I shot the 3D...
The only people I’ve heard mention weaker being more forgiving is Dudley, and Levi. When Duds was doing all his ladder testing Hoyt had some of the worst nock travel available. Levi has only made the reference when referring to 3D. I think it takes that level of archer to notice. Even then...
30 on that bow in reality probably is 30.25, or even 30.5. You need to take some lessons. If something needs to be tweaked a good coach can sort that out. Based on all of your posts I think are still chasing your tail.
Not a water buff hunter. Anyways I think the surface area of the glue in is substantially less than what you get with a long insert. The LRP system that was borrowed from Firenock would work nicely since the ferrule actually closes over the shaft.
That is ridiculous, there are plenty of bomb proof 200s on the market. The glue in system is not nearly as robust as something like a Valkyrie with the center pin either.
Seems like a ridiculous amount of front weight for a 400 spine with a 70 lb recurve. Are you sure you’re not shooting a wet noodle? You’d probably have better performance as well as an easier search if you dropped down to a 200 grain head.